Economy
In reply to the discussion: EF-0. Economy Stats with links to original sources. Links to LBN jobs threads thru 7/3/25 [View all]progree
(12,103 posts)[font color=blue]US Crude oil prices, is that EF 6? [/font]
Yes, I'm 95% sure. The oil price we hear and read all the time from the media is really a futures price, it seems, for example back in late June, it was the price for August delivery. Anyway, for the media-quoted oil price I look at the "Oil" at the top of the http://finance.yahoo.com page. And as EF 6 says about historic oil prices, I haven't found anything better than the weekly closing prices.
But to reduce the confusion, in EF 6. I replaced the topic line from "Oil Futures" to "Oil Prices". Thanks for the question.
[font color=blue]Infrastructure dollars spent per annum since 1933. Nominal & adjusted. [/font]
I have no idea where I would start to look for that.
[font color=blue]I have one for ya, number of income tax brackets
http://taxfoundation.org/article/us-federal-individual-income-tax-rates-history-1913-2011-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets [/font]
That's really something! Very interesting. I'm glad we don't have as many tax brackets as we used to have. Whew!
I have to give a note of caution though about the Tax Foundation - they are a RW greed-banger organization. Though that wouldn't (or shouldn't) be a problem for that table, I cringe at some of their policy recommendations and "studies" like that 60% of the cost of Romney's tax plan will be paid for by the greater economic growth it will create (higher economic growth generates higher tax revenues). The old magic supply side fairy dust that worked so well under Bush. As for it working under Reagan -- a. they usually leave out that payroll taxes were massively increased and b. the national debt nearly tripled - so the economic growth under Reagan was more the result of classical Keynesian deficit-spending pump priming than it was the result of an overall modest federal tax cut.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):