Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

DutchLiberal

(5,744 posts)

11. Not to mention the fact that lots of 'real women' do not have flabby, scarried stomaches.

Reply to Bonobo (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:31 PM

Apr 2012

So the premise is wrong.

And nothing is beautiful "because it's natural". Either something is beautiful or it isn't. It being natural or not has got nothing to do with it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Of "tummies", "love-handles" and "manboobs" [View all] Bonobo Dec 2011 OP

There's much that's natural but far from beautiful DavidDvorkin Dec 2011 #1

Agreed. Bonobo Dec 2011 #2

The burden on men is different from that on women but just as great DavidDvorkin Dec 2011 #5

You mean you don't see it all the time? saras Dec 2011 #3

I think that is a very good response. Bonobo Dec 2011 #4

The reason it is significant redqueen Dec 2011 #6

Many women find Jack Black attractive, despite the fact he has all three Taverner Jan 2012 #7

I'm going to need to see some scientific evidence to back up that claim. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #8

I don't know about "many" He loved Big Brother Apr 2012 #9

I like Tenacious D, and I like Jack Black Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #10

Not to mention the fact that lots of 'real women' do not have flabby, scarried stomaches. DutchLiberal Apr 2012 #11