Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
12. And people constantly raise this issue to anti porn crusaders, only to be told it's a "distraction"
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 06:18 PM
Jul 2012

And the imple question remains, "is there ANY graphic depiction of a man and woman having sex that you wouldnt object to/seek to censor?"

And the answer, after lots of hemming and hawing, is invariably "no" followed by endless rationlizations full of authoritative sounding blibber blabber like "patriarchy" and "the male gaze disrupts the flow of consciousness".

The imple truth is, NO, "acceptable porn" is impossible because to your 2nd wave Drowrkin-eucated cultist, the very act of PIV sex is the problem itself, as inherently oppressive an act as lynching, which is why they love to use that analogy in anti-1st Amendment screeds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The link between the reli...»Reply #12