Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
5. Problem is, pornography is a broad category.
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 03:25 AM
Jul 2012

It doesn't seem like it. I mean it's material made specifically to incite or aid in masturbation. Problem is, that covers a wide variety of different material.
Opponents make it sound like it's all the same. That it all is degrading, dehumanizing . . . and so on.

And they're a little behind the curve. For one thing, it looks like the production side is shutting down. The internet has so saturated the world with free porn, that there isn't a business model that makes it lucrative anymore. Now, maybe they'll develop one.

One trend that has come out, and that is women getting a webcam and putting on their own shows. No production company, no distributor, no men involved except as customers. She can be her own bouncer and ban them from her shows if they're rude. With today's technology, how are they proposing to ban that?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The link between the reli...»Reply #5