Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
4. White suburban males are already a minority.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 03:36 PM
Jun 2012

They are only an important voting bloc by default; women change their voting patterns when they marry.

Our approach of just writing them off has proven to be a failure, because of the phenomenon I posted in the OP. You're not writing off just them, but also their wives.

And no, I don't have any sure-fire ideas, but if there are any, this is where they'll start.

My best suggestion, cynical as it may sound, is 1) keep the patriarchal parts of gender political issues, the ones that men buy into on the basis of protecting their women (e.g. VAWA, health care reform, choice), jettison the gender warfare (paycheck equity), improve education for boys, insist on fairness in family court by making examples of some judges. End draft registration.

2) Get into John Edwards-esque economic populism in a big way, with emphasis on the job creating benefit of churning wealth through the economy rather than keeping it sequestered in a handful of banks.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To be more specific, it's white males. Kaleva Jun 2012 #1
Oh my Dokkie Jun 2012 #2
e) wait for white suburban males to be a minority. Warren Stupidity Jun 2012 #3
White suburban males are already a minority. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #4
more of a minority. Warren Stupidity Jun 2012 #5
All in it together? lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #6
Instead, why not work to retain married women? caseymoz Jun 2012 #10
Married women's interests are aligned with the family's interests. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #11
You see "reality," but I hold "negative stereotypes?" caseymoz Jun 2012 #12
conversational progression. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #13
Again, if you see "reality," but I hold "negative stereotypes" . . . caseymoz Jun 2012 #14
You don't like the facts or you don't like the conclusions? lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #15
I didn't read it. caseymoz Jun 2012 #16
I give it a 5. opiate69 Jun 2012 #17
Challenging opinions aren't everyones cup of tea. nt lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #18
yep... opiate69 Jun 2012 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #7
I think this is part of the solution. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #20
One would think so. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Wisconsin shows that demo...»Reply #4