Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:16 AM Jun 2012

Wisconsin shows that democrats need better outreach to men. [View all]

Men have a greater impact on voting than our 46% of all voters would suggest.

Single women support democrats by huge margins; 20 points as of this writing. As soon as they marry however, that support disappears. In 2008, there was a 44 point difference between the voting of married and single women. This effect is even more pronounced when they have kids. The voting patterns of a single mom is the polar opposite of the voting patterns of a married mom.

Unfortunately, single women are far less likely to vote than married women.

Statistically, when women marry, they adopt the voting patterns of their husbands. Essentially, men and married women vote as a bloc. When men marry, they become more likely to vote, but not significantly change their party preference.

Solutions?
a) make marriage more difficult.
b) convince women to keep their single voting preferences
c) convince men to adopt their new wife's voting preference
d) outreach to working class men.

A-C are impractical, which leaves D. It's a two-for-one deal.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To be more specific, it's white males. Kaleva Jun 2012 #1
Oh my Dokkie Jun 2012 #2
e) wait for white suburban males to be a minority. Warren Stupidity Jun 2012 #3
White suburban males are already a minority. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #4
more of a minority. Warren Stupidity Jun 2012 #5
All in it together? lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #6
Instead, why not work to retain married women? caseymoz Jun 2012 #10
Married women's interests are aligned with the family's interests. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #11
You see "reality," but I hold "negative stereotypes?" caseymoz Jun 2012 #12
conversational progression. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #13
Again, if you see "reality," but I hold "negative stereotypes" . . . caseymoz Jun 2012 #14
You don't like the facts or you don't like the conclusions? lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #15
I didn't read it. caseymoz Jun 2012 #16
I give it a 5. opiate69 Jun 2012 #17
Challenging opinions aren't everyones cup of tea. nt lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #18
yep... opiate69 Jun 2012 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #7
I think this is part of the solution. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #20
One would think so. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Wisconsin shows that demo...»Reply #0