Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: If I actually thought there were "Anti-Feminists" in this group, I would kick them out. [View all]Major Nikon
(36,922 posts)9. I have no issues with the term "white privilege"
There are few, if any privileges associated with being non-white in this country. The term "male privilege" is a bit more problematic. While there are privileges associated with being male, the same is true for being female. At best it's a wash. The same people who demand people accept the term "male privilege" reject "female privilege" even after you quantify "female privilege" and they refuse to quantify "male privilege". At some point the discussion is banal and becomes much like religion in that you have to believe in something that's completely abstract. You also have those who conflate the two into "white male privilege" which is meaningless.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

If I actually thought there were "Anti-Feminists" in this group, I would kick them out. [View all]
Bonobo
Jan 2014
OP
The idea that disagreeing with one or a group of feminists, makes one anti-feminist is rubbish
Major Nikon
Jan 2014
#1
I'm always amused at the "You're not doing feminism correctly" snark from certain quarters
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jan 2014
#2
If I had time to get bothered about every ridiculous name some random Ginkus calls me on DU
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2014
#4
As I've said before, I think we on DU generally agree on 90% of the really essential stuff.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#5
For instance, if one admits that systemic racism is still a problem in this country - which is a big
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#7
I don't disagree with any of that. I understand perfectly well where some of these reactions come
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#11
Denying the mass-level effects of racism doesn't help working-class white folks in the slightest.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#12
Maybe not in those exact words, but people reacting so defensively to discussions about racism
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#14
Social class is a vitally important distinction as well. Some downplay it far too much
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#19
All I'm saying is we each have to be able to articulate our reality honestly, without self-censoring
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#17
I think I've demonstrated my general broad support for "speaking one's mind"
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2014
#18
And yes, harsh truth needs to balanced with a more conciliatory aspect. I don't disagree there.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#20
You'll forgive me if I don't get too worked up over the "silencing" of so-called "heroes"
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2014
#21
I didn't say intaglio was a hero. He was being a complete asshole to you and that wasn't fair.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#22