Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
33. Maybe I should clarify 'low sex drive.'
Wed May 23, 2012, 12:57 AM
May 2012

Last edited Wed May 23, 2012, 11:04 AM - Edit history (1)

I would like to say "narrow sex drive," but that sounds like a tautology. In fact, it isn't. It also sounds like it's similar to the notion of narrow-mindedness. It isn't.

Think of a sex drive as being like a faucet of variable width. It can have a narrow hard flow, it can have a broader weak flow, a narrow weak flow or even a broad hard flow.

The width represents the number of different sexual practices a person is capable of feeling even a small amount of pleasure from, and therefore can understand other people who also have that pleasure.

A person who doesn't respond at all to voyeurism is not going to understand porn. Also, voyeurs are going to seem weird to them. Understanding arousal from such a thing is, for them, like a colorblind person understanding red. They are going to be suspicious about people who do respond to voyeurism.

I'm also not talking about someone who is apathetic about sex. Sex is powerful in its psychological effects. Given the weirdness and creepiness that they're already going to feel, there are secondary emotions about sex that are usually superseded by pleasure. If they can't feel pleasure toward a sex act, what's bound to be dominant are things like nausea, jealousy, disgust.

This is not similar to narrow-mindedness either, in that responses to different sexual stimuli (or even sexually related stimuli) is unconscious. It's not anything a person can willfully alter. Though it's not necessarily fixed.

So, I don't think the sex industry is ever going to be in a fully accepted and legal. I don't think we're going to change any minds about it, and I think any intellectual justification for objections, like patriarchal theory or objectification, are actually rationalizations for very primal emotions.

I can add that this can also applies the other way. People with more "understanding" due to a broader sex drive are as motivated by their unconscious. They can't understand where we see red, and we can't understand where they see gray.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Your premise seems to be that people who don't like porn don't like sex. Scuba May 2012 #1
No, that's not my premise. caseymoz May 2012 #2
Conjecture, your honor. Scuba May 2012 #4
So, I offend them. caseymoz May 2012 #5
I agree. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #7
Here's what has been noted scientifically: caseymoz May 2012 #11
And your citations for these claims are your memory???? Scuba May 2012 #23
You're shocked! Shocked! caseymoz May 2012 #25
Everyone eats food. Not everyone enjoys food, and fewer still read about food. NYC_SKP May 2012 #3
I would say that's the major basis of it. caseymoz May 2012 #9
In my experience, porn is primarily a 2nd wave jawbone with which to beat men. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #6
No means no caseymoz May 2012 #8
Here's my take: One, it IS an issue to SOME Feminists, because they consider it one. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #10
Snap Crackle and Pop was taken as a personal attack? Gore1FL May 2012 #12
It reads like satire, doesn't it? Warren DeMontague May 2012 #13
Let me guess... Gore1FL May 2012 #15
If I didn't say "prude" I'd have to come up with another term. caseymoz May 2012 #17
A good point . . . caseymoz May 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Upton May 2012 #14
I think there are a lot of issues at work here.. Upton May 2012 #16
it can be. improving the life of sex workers and creating laws to prohibit La Lioness Priyanka May 2012 #18
That's the way it should work. caseymoz May 2012 #19
yeah but i dont think it has to do with low sex drives. it has to do with a belief La Lioness Priyanka May 2012 #24
Well, there is that. caseymoz May 2012 #26
This is an interesting post. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #31
Maybe I should clarify 'low sex drive.' caseymoz May 2012 #33
As we are all no doubt aware, "Feminist" thought is by no means uniform on this issue. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #21
porn goes back to the paleolithic art. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #27
Well, sure, who wants to just draw antelope all day? Warren DeMontague May 2012 #28
And there we people disturbed by it then. caseymoz May 2012 #29
I don't care if someone doesn't like porn ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2012 #30
Masturbation was disgusting to her? 4th law of robotics May 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»I believe porn isn't real...»Reply #33