Men's Group

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)

8. No means no

Sun May 20, 2012, 09:43 PM

May 2012

I agree with that.

But yes doesn't mean yes?

For someone concerned about the plight of the poor women in the sex industry, sex-neg feminists treat them like dirt. I've seen them clash with on youtube and the sex-negs were absolutely cruel. They really have no use for women who are unrepentant about being in the industry. It would seem to me if they felt anything like humanitarianism, they would be at least cordial.

If you ever see any shows that have women giving pro- and con- porn or prostitution views, you may notice an interesting thing: unlike any other issue, they never have them on at the same time. Now, maybe it's happened when I didn't see it, but noticed that, and noticed no other issue is treated like that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I believe porn isn't really a feminist issue. [View all] caseymoz May 2012 OP

Your premise seems to be that people who don't like porn don't like sex. Scuba May 2012 #1

No, that's not my premise. caseymoz May 2012 #2

Conjecture, your honor. Scuba May 2012 #4

So, I offend them. caseymoz May 2012 #5

I agree. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #7

Here's what has been noted scientifically: caseymoz May 2012 #11

And your citations for these claims are your memory???? Scuba May 2012 #23

You're shocked! Shocked! caseymoz May 2012 #25

Everyone eats food. Not everyone enjoys food, and fewer still read about food. NYC_SKP May 2012 #3

I would say that's the major basis of it. caseymoz May 2012 #9

In my experience, porn is primarily a 2nd wave jawbone with which to beat men. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #6

No means no caseymoz May 2012 #8

Here's my take: One, it IS an issue to SOME Feminists, because they consider it one. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #10

Snap Crackle and Pop was taken as a personal attack? Gore1FL May 2012 #12

It reads like satire, doesn't it? Warren DeMontague May 2012 #13

Let me guess... Gore1FL May 2012 #15

If I didn't say "prude" I'd have to come up with another term. caseymoz May 2012 #17

A good point . . . caseymoz May 2012 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Upton May 2012 #14

I think there are a lot of issues at work here.. Upton May 2012 #16

it can be. improving the life of sex workers and creating laws to prohibit La Lioness Priyanka May 2012 #18

That's the way it should work. caseymoz May 2012 #19

yeah but i dont think it has to do with low sex drives. it has to do with a belief La Lioness Priyanka May 2012 #24

Well, there is that. caseymoz May 2012 #26

This is an interesting post. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #31

Maybe I should clarify 'low sex drive.' caseymoz May 2012 #33

As we are all no doubt aware, "Feminist" thought is by no means uniform on this issue. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2012 #21

porn goes back to the paleolithic art. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #27

Well, sure, who wants to just draw antelope all day? Warren DeMontague May 2012 #28

And there we people disturbed by it then. caseymoz May 2012 #29

I don't care if someone doesn't like porn ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2012 #30

Masturbation was disgusting to her? 4th law of robotics May 2012 #32