Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
John Kerry
Showing Original Post only (View all)State Department comments on the response to the Issa letter on emails [View all]
Here is what was said in the State Department briefing yesterday:
QUESTION: The New York Times had a report out today showing that Congress or Chairman Issa sent a letter to Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State asking about her use of personal email, and the State Department got back after she had left in March of 2013. Do you have any response to that or --
MR RATHKE: Response to what particular aspect of it?
QUESTION: The reason for the delay in response or why it was that the response didnt occur in December of 2012 when the letter was first --
MR RATHKE: Well, I think as youre probably aware but maybe it bears repeating, we receive thousands of requests from Congress every year. We responded to this request in it was in December of 2012 that the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee sent a letter to the State Department and other cabinet agencies, and it requested information on the departments policies and practices regarding the use of personal email and other forms of electronic communications. And so in March 2013 the department responded to the inquiry. We described our policies in detail. We included also relevant attachments that governed the departments policies. So thats that was the nature of the response, and we continue to work closely with Congress on various issues related to the policies and procedures of the State Department.
Yeah.
QUESTION: But the (inaudible) did not answer the questions from Issas letter, did you?
MR RATHKE: Well, again, the chairmans letter asked about the departments policies and practices, and we responded on those policies and practices.
QUESTION: But the first question from Chairman Issas letter was: Does any senior official at the State Department use a private email account? And I did not see that in the response.
MR RATHKE: Well, we responded to the committee in detail on our policy. I dont have anything more to add.
QUESTION: But do you acknowledge you didnt answer the question?
MR RATHKE: Well, again, the question was focused on on the policies and practices. I dont have anything further to add.
QUESTION: But the first question is: Does was very specific. It said: Does anybody, any senior official, have a private email account?
MR RATHKE: Yeah. I just dont have anything more to add on that.
QUESTION: Well, in March 13 did any senior official have a private email account?
MR RATHKE: Did any of them have a private email account? How do you --
QUESTION: Well, when you answered the letter, did any of them have first of all, why is three months the normal timeframe that it takes to respond to a --
MR RATHKE: I dont know if I have the statistics on the length of time to respond to congressional inquiries. I mean, sometimes the response takes some time. I dont --
QUESTION: Three months? I mean, is that --
MR RATHKE: Again, we get --
QUESTION: You said youre deluged with them, and Im just wondering.
MR RATHKE: We get thousands of requests. I dont have a timeline of the average response time.
QUESTION: Okay. But the question that Lucas raises well, the question that Chairman Issa raised in the letter was not answered, correct? I mean, it may be that by the time that you got around to answering the letter the people who had private email accounts had already left and werent working for the State Department anymore and --
MR RATHKE: Yeah, Im happy to look and see if theres if theres more detail on that.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2015/04/240725.htm
Somethings that appear distorted:
1) This was a request sent to multiple departments.
2) It was answered in March -- at which point most Clinton people had left -- in fact, they were incredibly involved in staffing all those positions. So, at the point they answered the question, which appears NOT to have asked about HRC, the question would have related to John Kerry, who was using state.gov.
(This was posted earlier on GD, but I reposted it here in case people were concerned about the NYT story. It looks like their answer in March was easy - because Kerry was using state.gov! ) It also does sound like the question is what IS the Secretary of State using -- and in March - the answer and the policy were ... State.gov.
I had posted it on GD, because I thought that it was important that people know that the article distorted it to make it look like the State Department was hiding what Clinton was doing. But, I think the Obama supporters did not read it and the Clinton people just blasted that Issa would even question HRC.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

State Department comments on the response to the Issa letter on emails [View all]
karynnj
Apr 2015
OP
Since we know Issa has always been honest and followed all rules (like hell he did)
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#1
No, it is not about defending Issa, far from defending Issa, but to point out we can not rely on
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#3