Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

In reply to the discussion: WT (Everlasting) F? [View all]

ladym55

(2,577 posts)
3. They were good
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jul 2016

I was a loyal viewer, too, but then they decided to become the "place for politics," so they could join the rest of the media in spewing right-wing talking points all day long. Okay, maybe Rachel Maddow doesn't, but it appears the rest are all about Beltway talking points. They had so many good people on board, and one by one, the big bosses threw them under the bus.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WT (Everlasting) F? [View all] Laurian Jul 2016 OP
You wouldn't want them to cover REAL news now, would you? ladym55 Jul 2016 #1
Oh for the "old days" of MSNBC. Laurian Jul 2016 #2
They were good ladym55 Jul 2016 #3
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»WT (Everlasting) F?»Reply #3