Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: The Congressional Black Caucus 'vehemently' opposes Sanders' call to abolish superdelegates.(HRC GP) [View all]Her Sister
(6,444 posts)41. Here is the CBC letter: http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000155-6a23-dbd7-a5d5-fe6f76ef0000
June 18, 2016
An Open Letter to our Democratic Colleagues and Party Leaders
To: Secretary Hillary Clinton
Senator Bernie Sanders
Hon. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, Chair, DNC
Hon. Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader
Senator Harry Reid, Senate Democratic Leader
To Whom It May Concern:
The Democratic Members of the Congressional Black Caucus recently voted unanimously to oppose any
suggestion or idea to eliminate the category of Unpledged Delegate to the Democratic National
Convention (aka Super Delegates) and the creation of uniform open primaries in all states.
The Democratic Party benefits from the current system of unpledged delegates to the National
Convention by virtue of rules that allow members of the House and Senate to be seated as a delegate
without the burdensome necessity of competing against constituents for the honor of representing the
state during the nominating process.
The origin of the unpledged delegate selection process authored by Congressman James E. Clyburn, DSC
is attached to this letter. It accurately chronicles the use of the unpledged delegate system and sets
out with particularity the reasons why this system was enacted many years ago. The system of allowing
members of Congress to serve as unpledged delegates has worked quite well. There is no need to
succumb to the pressure of a few individuals to make this change. We oppose any change to the
current delegate selection process for members of Congress.
The CBC is opposed to any state nominating system that would allow independent or Republican voters
to participate in a Democratic Primary. The Democratic Party primary is the process used by the party to
allow political aspirants to compete for their partys nomination. Allowing independent or Republican
voters to participate in the Democratic primary would dilute minority voting strength in many districts
across the country.
Finally, the members of the Congressional Black Caucus respectfully request that we be included in any
discussion that will change the system of unpledged delegates. In addition, we should be included in
any discussion that would seek to change the nominating rules to open primaries. These are significant
issues that directly affects our ability to effectively participate in the political process.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
G.K. Butterfield
G. K. Butterfield, Chairman
Democratic Caucus of the Congressional Black Caucus
An Open Letter to our Democratic Colleagues and Party Leaders
To: Secretary Hillary Clinton
Senator Bernie Sanders
Hon. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, Chair, DNC
Hon. Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leader
Senator Harry Reid, Senate Democratic Leader
To Whom It May Concern:
The Democratic Members of the Congressional Black Caucus recently voted unanimously to oppose any
suggestion or idea to eliminate the category of Unpledged Delegate to the Democratic National
Convention (aka Super Delegates) and the creation of uniform open primaries in all states.
The Democratic Party benefits from the current system of unpledged delegates to the National
Convention by virtue of rules that allow members of the House and Senate to be seated as a delegate
without the burdensome necessity of competing against constituents for the honor of representing the
state during the nominating process.
The origin of the unpledged delegate selection process authored by Congressman James E. Clyburn, DSC
is attached to this letter. It accurately chronicles the use of the unpledged delegate system and sets
out with particularity the reasons why this system was enacted many years ago. The system of allowing
members of Congress to serve as unpledged delegates has worked quite well. There is no need to
succumb to the pressure of a few individuals to make this change. We oppose any change to the
current delegate selection process for members of Congress.
The CBC is opposed to any state nominating system that would allow independent or Republican voters
to participate in a Democratic Primary. The Democratic Party primary is the process used by the party to
allow political aspirants to compete for their partys nomination. Allowing independent or Republican
voters to participate in the Democratic primary would dilute minority voting strength in many districts
across the country.
Finally, the members of the Congressional Black Caucus respectfully request that we be included in any
discussion that will change the system of unpledged delegates. In addition, we should be included in
any discussion that would seek to change the nominating rules to open primaries. These are significant
issues that directly affects our ability to effectively participate in the political process.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
G.K. Butterfield
G. K. Butterfield, Chairman
Democratic Caucus of the Congressional Black Caucus
Here is the CBC letter: http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000155-6a23-dbd7-a5d5-fe6f76ef0000
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The Congressional Black Caucus 'vehemently' opposes Sanders' call to abolish superdelegates.(HRC GP) [View all]
Her Sister
Jun 2016
OP
I'm glad you posted it here in Hill's Group, HS.. I wouldn't have seen it elsewhere. Besides
Cha
Jun 2016
#29
Well, you're wrong.. just because some do.. you do not get to broadbrush them in Hill's Group.
Cha
Jun 2016
#28
They would have gone with it like they're going with them being behind Hillary now. But that
Cha
Jun 2016
#27
Open primaries gave us Geoffrey Fieger in Michigan and Alvin Greene in South Carolina
bluestateguy
Jun 2016
#8
The CBC is absolutely right, and I agree with them 1000%, but I want the caucuses abolished.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2016
#13
SDs should stay; caucuses should go; and primaries should be closed. These are the changes I believe
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#47
Especially a loser who is not even a Democrat and is going back to his Independent status
Her Sister
Jun 2016
#17
I'm so grateful they are.. It would be stupid to get rid of SDs because the Loser said so.
Cha
Jun 2016
#36
Here is the CBC letter: http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000155-6a23-dbd7-a5d5-fe6f76ef0000
Her Sister
Jun 2016
#41
As I noted in another thread, the SDs are there to avoid situations like Donald Trump.
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#45