Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
21. A calm, rational description of trade promotion authority (TPA).
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 08:22 PM
Jun 2015

This is from a letter my congress critter sent me, Rep. Martha Roby (R-AL). She is neutral on trade and is likely to vote no, but she doesn't spin it:

"Included in Congress' enumerated powers are those to levy taxes, duties, and to regulate commerce with foreign nations, while the president is charged with the authority to enter treaties and international agreements after seeking the advice and consent of the Senate. After many decades, TPA emerged as a compromise method for Congress to set legal boundaries and backstops for trade negotiations, but retains Congressional power for final approval of any trade deal. Various versions of TPA authorization have passed Congress since the Trade Act of 1974, and the most recent TPA agreement expired in 2007.

Ways and Means Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) introduced legislation that would reauthorize TPA, the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (H.R. 1890). This legislation requires the president to pursue a strictly outlined set of negotiating principles, including human rights issues and currency manipulation to promote more open, equitable market access. Any proposal would be available to view by the public for 60 days before presidential signature."

This demonstrates it would be the will of Congress for President Obama to pursue free trade agreements, not something the president tries to take from Congress.

Could you imagine the administration working for 6, 7, even 8 years on the most progressive trade policies ever, and we abandon our support for this president?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"True rank-and-file Democrats would never support this." yallerdawg May 2015 #1
Interestingly, ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #2
It's true. Like the President said, "we've got folks still fighting the last battle". Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #27
I remember all the horrid threads about ACA Iliyah May 2015 #3
I agree. Andy823 May 2015 #4
+1 treestar Jun 2015 #23
And Social Security, and DADT, and DOMA, and Iraq and on and on ... JoePhilly Jun 2015 #26
"Trade agreements should proceed through open Congressional Regular Order." yallerdawg May 2015 #5
Major goal post shifting, and for what? ucrdem May 2015 #7
149 amendments have been proposed revising TPA so far. yallerdawg May 2015 #14
One day later... yallerdawg May 2015 #15
for the record... steve2470 May 2015 #6
Wow ucrdem May 2015 #8
I think the problem is that trade is a Dem wedge issue. ucrdem May 2015 #9
No elected Democrat can go wrong opposing trade deals. yallerdawg May 2015 #11
Yep. That's why there are a lot of maybes in the California delegation at least. ucrdem May 2015 #12
Chicken or egg? yallerdawg May 2015 #10
"'Fast track' greases the skids." yallerdawg May 2015 #13
Belated kick Hekate May 2015 #16
conversation with my activist brother about TPP went like this steve2470 Jun 2015 #17
yes -I'm also very pro-labor (especially these days, when labor is getting shafted all around) MBS Jun 2015 #20
This is how I see President Obama and the TPP steve2470 Jun 2015 #24
ditto, ditto, ditto n/t MBS Jun 2015 #25
Kick! Cha Jun 2015 #18
Pew Research, May 27: "Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S." ucrdem Jun 2015 #19
A calm, rational description of trade promotion authority (TPA). yallerdawg Jun 2015 #21
Good explanation. ucrdem Jun 2015 #22
Who advises on TPP? Just corporations? yallerdawg Jun 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»BARACK OBAMA GROUP: Excel...»Reply #21