Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Barack Obama

In reply to the discussion: The long game of Obamacare [View all]
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. I think the game was to get something passed. Passing nothing would have been catastrophic.
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 05:45 PM
Sep 2013

I don't believe Obama got what he would have preferred, but he got what was doable at the time. To get nothing passed would have been catastrophic, and left us with little chance of improvement for at least a decade (remember Hilliarycare's defeat).

I think the framework is now there for movement to a public option or single payer. In the meantime, 30 million people will have access to coverage, insurer's can't deny coverage for pre-existing conditions, and more.


Fact is, even if we had gone to Medicare for all -- just like now, insurance companies would have handled the administrative functions and even offer Medicare Advantage Plans (that 28% of current Medicare beneficiaries have chosen voluntarily). It would not have eliminated insurance companies, no matter how much we hate them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»The long game of Obamacar...»Reply #2