Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
19. I haven’t read the comments to this OP; but …
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 09:30 PM
Aug 2013

I suspect the answer to the “Why choose Option 1, first” question is BECAUSE these leakers have so little faith that the law will be followed.

While that course betrays a complete lack of respect for the rule of law and every democratic institution, I think in their mind’s eye, that is the point of their exercise … to kill the institution in order to save it … and from the ashen ruins will arise a of perfect liberty AND security.

But to your OP:

If Assange and Greenwald had done that for their prospective sources, there would still be a story there, it may not have been as sensational but there would have been a story, the difference is, neither Manning nor Snowden would be facing imprisonment or exile.


With this scenario, I would argue that the story would be BIGGER, in that GAS could disclose that they attempted to go the lawful route, but were thwarted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»Full Transcript for my Se...»Reply #19