Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Parable Arable

(126 posts)
12. I'm having a debate with a friend...
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:34 PM
Aug 2013

Personally, I think Snowden and Manning both raised legitimate concerns, though I very much disagree with the manner in which they went about leaking their information. But I digress. I brought the point to my friend that Snowden/Manning could have both gone to congress with their concerns. He responded that both of those guys would have swiftly been muzzled/detained/tortured and that any act which protects a whistle-blower would have been violated by the government. How would you respond to that argument and would you believe that it's ultimately detrimental for a government to the protection act? If so, what would happen if they did?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»Full Transcript for my Se...»Reply #12