Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Website, DB, & Software Developers

(47,675 posts)

11. VB 6 was okay, but it was rather limited when it comes to large projects.

Wed Mar 7, 2012, 09:53 AM

Mar 2012

"Was", he says, while he still has machines with VB 4, 5, and 6 on them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Visual Studio 11's UI is sharper than you think [View all] Renew Deal Mar 2012 OP

::::HERE IS HOW I DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENCE:::: ChromeFoundry Mar 2012 #2

Well, that sums it up well. I'll stick with VS10. Thanks! HopeHoops Mar 2012 #3

I've tried it, and I can't get used to the changes EvolveOrConvolve Mar 2012 #4

That's called an M$ Developer. HopeHoops Mar 2012 #5

Yep, and they'd started moving in the right direction with VS2008 and VS2010 EvolveOrConvolve Mar 2012 #6

Hey... ChromeFoundry Mar 2012 #8

VERY FUNNY. I LIKED THAT! HopeHoops Mar 2012 #9

Reminds me of VB 6 Ziggystrange Mar 2012 #10

VB6 is not quite dead yet. Ziggystrange Mar 2012 #12