Montana

and it may serve as a motivation for the the grade changing, but what troubles me is the following:

1. I find it hard to accept that one single administrator decided to take this action without any obvious motivation. I can speculate on the motivation, but it does not appear that sufficient investigation went into that fact.

2. How is this not a crime. This is an individual who changed official state records and received compensation for it. That seems like bribery of a public official to me even if no specific law related to grade changing.

3. Contrast how this scandal was handled to the similar scandal involving Southern University. I wonder what the difference is between the two. Before the Saudi connection was revealed the original scandal received little coverage.