Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Montana

2naSalit

(97,355 posts)

1. I think that means

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Fri Apr 26, 2019, 07:30 PM

Apr 2019

the plants will all shut down. What about the coal mine part? I was wondering if this argument wasn't also intended to force western states to allow for a new sea port for the coal. Anyway, I think this shuts it all down but I'm not 100% on the mine. I just heard about the coal operations just south of there, in WY, not having a good day either. Maybe we cn get rid of coal faster than we thought. They've got plenty of sun and wind out there in that part of the world.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Save Colstrip' plan falls through on last day of Montana legislature [View all] TexasTowelie Apr 2019 OP

I think that means 2naSalit Apr 2019 #1

Understand there is a Coal Haul Contract in place Wellstone ruled Apr 2019 #2