Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 93 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»This message was self-del...»Reply #3
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Iowa

In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]

Indykatie

(3,862 posts)
3. He'd Be On Social Security Since He's 65+ Years Old. He's Not Eligible for SSDI at That Age.
Reply to Bayard (Reply #2)
Fri Jul 31, 2020, 01:13 AM
Jul 2020

Sad that someone of his age and health status is working at all.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] 47of74 Jul 2020 OP
he probably won't live long enough to repay dweller Jul 2020 #1
Why isn't he on disability anyway? Bayard Jul 2020 #2
He'd Be On Social Security Since He's 65+ Years Old. He's Not Eligible for SSDI at That Age. Indykatie Jul 2020 #3
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»This message was self-del...»Reply #3
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2025 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.