Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Iowa

sl8

(16,672 posts)

6. Maybe so, but it should make it very hard for any future jurist to suggest that anything ...

Reply to rurallib (Reply #2)

Tue Oct 25, 2022, 12:08 PM

Oct 2022

Maybe so, but it should make it very hard for any future jurist to suggest that anything less than strict scrutiny is warranted. I'll take that over prettier prose.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun Amendment Language Intentionally Confusing: Vote NO [View all] rurallib Oct 2022 OP

Sounds similar to Vermont's proposed abortion amendment. sl8 Oct 2022 #1

good grief that short paragraph is truly confusing rurallib Oct 2022 #2

Maybe so, but it should make it very hard for any future jurist to suggest that anything ... sl8 Oct 2022 #6

Strict scrutiny would be preferable to what the Bruen decision have us DetroitLegalBeagle Oct 2022 #3

refresh us a bit on Bruen please? rurallib Oct 2022 #4

yea, the NY gun case DetroitLegalBeagle Oct 2022 #5

Yep. progressoid Oct 2022 #7