Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caraher

(6,329 posts)
4. On that one issue, yes
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 10:29 AM
Nov 2012

You really can flip a coin there; Donnelly just has the sense not to say stupid things about rape, and right there you have most of the difference on abortion between the two.

But this still would be a big win. One vote fewer in the Senate to mindlessly obstruct legislation in Obama's second term. One more vote to confirm any Supreme Court appointments in the next six year. And if you want to defend Roe v. Wade, every D in the Senate is critical. I can't imagine Donnelly taking a single-issue stand against an Obama nominee just to burnish his credentials as a centrist or pro-lifer.

Mourdock is such an idiot that he actually spent state taxpayer dollars fighting the auto bailout and the preservation of factory jobs in Indiana. He's the worst kind of teahadist, and he's so dangerous that I played Republican for a day to vote for Lugar in the open primary - my fear that he could actually take office was greater than my hope that we could pick up a seat, and most of the Democrats I know did the same. So my rejoicing is great and, I think, well-founded!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Indiana»Nate Silver flips the pro...»Reply #4