Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Florida

Jerry2144

(2,918 posts)

2. I'd vote no

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Oct 22, 2024, 03:25 PM

Oct 2024

If there is a reason to stop allowing hunting of a certain animal, that amendment would block the logical reason. For instance, a species is endangered or on the verge of extinction, the state or fed can’t block a hunter’s “right” to kill it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

radical noodle

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pros and cons on Florida's Amendment 2: Preserving the right to hunt and fish [View all] RandySF Oct 2024 OP

I was told that Florida Democrats' official stand on this is NO radical noodle Oct 2024 #1

I'd vote no Jerry2144 Oct 2024 #2

I voted NO. It wants to encroach on the Fish and Wildlife Conservation responsibilities too much for me Deuxcents Oct 2024 #3