Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

TeamProg

(6,630 posts)

4. I'm suggesting that either the article's info is incomplete or the powers that be haven't figured

Reply to quaint (Reply #2)

Fri Mar 17, 2023, 11:43 AM

Mar 2023

everything out quite yet.

But again, land is $$$ where the jobs are. Many homeless have jobs, but can't afford rents.

And the unemployed homeless might not care to be uprooted to MS, AL, AR or to the Calif. desert.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gov Newsom Announces $1 Billion in Homelessness Funding, Launches State's Largest Mobilization [View all] quaint Mar 2023 OP

Where are the tiny houses going to be located? The land where the jobs are TeamProg Mar 2023 #1

What is your solutuon? quaint Mar 2023 #2

I'm suggesting that either the article's info is incomplete or the powers that be haven't figured TeamProg Mar 2023 #4

Yes. Lot of details to work out ... Auggie Mar 2023 #6

Thank you. quaint Mar 2023 #8

Most every locality has forfeited property IbogaProject Mar 2023 #9

Land is cheaper where there are low-tech jobs. usonian Mar 2023 #3

Please see my posted reply to Quaint above. TeamProg Mar 2023 #5

Here in L.A. they have put the tiny home villages on land already owned by the city, such as parks. beaglelover Mar 2023 #7