Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Crafts

In reply to the discussion: The science of knittng [View all]

cyclonefence

(5,120 posts)
4. This guy lost my interest when
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 07:02 PM
Sep 6

he showed an all-purl design (essentially the *back* of a stockinette sample) and identified it as stockinette. If they can't get something as basic as what stockinette looks like, I can't take anything they say about knitting seriously.

I know, I know; it's about physics or something, and I'm sure it was enlightening, but it just griped my ass that they would make such a stupid error.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The science of knittng [View all] alfredo Sep 6 OP
OK that was pretty cool. Batshit_Bruin_CA Sep 6 #1
direct opposite for me. I never could get the needles co-ordinated. yellowdogintexas Sep 6 #3
That was fascinating! ShazzieB Sep 6 #2
This guy lost my interest when cyclonefence Sep 6 #4
That was way cool, Thanks!! nt mitch96 Sep 6 #5
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Crafts»The science of knittng»Reply #4