Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Socialist Progressives

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)

11. ?

Reply to wasupaloopa (Reply #10)

Thu May 3, 2018, 08:40 PM

May 2018

It fits into the models I studied. It's just public spending/a transfer program. Nothing new about that.

As an aside, conventional economic models are pretty bogus. They have glaring omissions and use flawed assumptions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yang 2020. Let's put humanity first. It's time for Universal Basic Income. [View all] yallerdawg May 2018 OP

I have these questions about basic income. wasupaloopa May 2018 #1

"Rules of economics?" yallerdawg May 2018 #2

Thanks for the reply but that is not an answer wasupaloopa May 2018 #3

When a robot creates something of value... yallerdawg May 2018 #4

Henry Ford paid $5 a day because the jobs were so bad workers wasupaloopa May 2018 #7

Your world view may be realistic - in a capitalist system, of course. yallerdawg May 2018 #8

Good questions. PETRUS May 2018 #9

To me universal basic income does not wasupaloopa May 2018 #10

? PETRUS May 2018 #11

I would like to hear from an economist who teaches, to give me the model with a wasupaloopa May 2018 #12

You can believe whatever you want, of course. PETRUS May 2018 #13

I think I told you twice now. The money does not come from any type of productive effort on the wasupaloopa May 2018 #14

Take your fingers out of your ears. PETRUS May 2018 #15

Productive effort? Animal, Vegetable, or Mineral? fleabiscuit May 2018 #17

很好! geardaddy May 2018 #5

We have to recognize our own obsolesence! yallerdawg May 2018 #6

I agree with your reasoning, and have one concern. Music908 May 2018 #16

How about we start by taxing ALL forms of compensation as regular income? fleabiscuit May 2018 #18