Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
4. Thanks for the props, but ..........
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:39 AM
Feb 2016

it's not really a new concept. This is classic Marxism from a economist that has followed and noted trends in the capitalist economy for many years. As I said I personally, have been following Roberts blogs for five years or so and he's been writing and studying longer than that.

Marx based most his theories about the development of capitalism in its mature state on the tendency of the rate of profit to fall as new methods become available to cut costs. This merely backs up that tendency and shows how it works in the real economy. I shared this because I thought that this particular post shows that "how it works" most clearly.

One thing that capitalist propaganda has done the best IMO is to make EVERYBODY think that they're a capitalist when the truth is only a few are really capitalist. Now while it's true that we're all involved in the market, an artisan who makes scarves for sale on that market is NOT a capitalist. If he/she makes a scarf for $5 worth of materials and sells that scarf for $20, that doesn't mean he/she earned $15 in "profit". What he/she did was price his/her labor time at $15 per scarf. That's not profit, that's his/her labor time as defined by the market for scarves.

And it's the same for most small businesses, more or less. The petit bourgeoisie are not really capitalist like the grande bourgeoisie are. A Mom and Pop widget producer is usually happy to make ANY profit on their widgets, especially if that profit comes on the heels of enough cash flow to keep the business going and provide a salary that keeps body and soul together for the proprietor. ANY profit over and above that mark is something to be rejoiced in. For the big capitalists the dynamic is different. They must make enough profit to, not only pay for the greed of the collective ownership of the company (the shareholders getting paid dividends), but also enough to reinvest in expansion. Which is why you see "profitable" assets closed down and moved to places where there is even more profit to be made. IOW, it's not just a matter of "profit" for the big bourgeoisie, it's a matter of ENOUGH profit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Very interesting. Thanks. hedda_foil Feb 2016 #1
Thank You For Sharing These Truths cantbeserious Feb 2016 #2
Wow, that's an eye opener. Gregorian Feb 2016 #3
Thanks for the props, but .......... socialist_n_TN Feb 2016 #4
Thanks! I appreciate your comments and thoughts. Gregorian Feb 2016 #5
Richard is pretty good IMO...... socialist_n_TN Feb 2016 #6
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»This is a REALLY good blo...»Reply #4