Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(112,378 posts)
2. I'm not sure it was all malign, albeit intrusive. Infants born to mothers with no father indicated were 59% more
Sun Oct 19, 2025, 09:59 AM
Oct 19

likely to suffer early infant death--presumedly from a lack of resources. Those who listed two parents, but not living together, were 17% more likely to die early. This is from data from the UK, but presumedly similar in this country. So, it was a means to monitor social welfare issues. Again, there might have been more malign reasons, but at least this documented the problem with
(mostly) fathers who ditched any financial responsibility.

https://shs.cairn.info/revue-annales-de-demographie-historique-2006-1-page-89?lang=en

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»OMIGOD! Found copy of my ...»Reply #2