Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,687 posts)
12. This is probably off topic in the Lounge, but Carter's energy policy "to get off oil" was potentially disastrous.
Sun Oct 5, 2025, 12:09 PM
6 hrs ago

It included Fischer-Tropsch chemistry, which would have proved even more climatically odious than oil and gas.

It was a viable, but extremely dirty, coal to oil process, industrialized in Nazi Germany and in Apartheid era South Africa.

I loved Jimmy Carter the man, and I voted for him twice, but while many people think his energy policies were wise, I'm glad they fell through.

His decision to give a "moral example" - a reflection of his religious views - by not reprocessing used nuclear fuel was not wise, although, I will admit that if he'd moved forward, as Britain and France did, ignoring his "moral example," it would have been a Purex chemistry approach, not the best. I think there is far better technology now and happily, we now have lots of aged used nuclear fuel, if we're wise enough to use it.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»I definitely wore my wife...»Reply #12