Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

lostincalifornia

(5,431 posts)

21. Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT?

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Thu Apr 16, 2026, 07:29 PM

Thursday

It was the jackasses who repeatedly refused to vote for the Democratic candidate because it didn't match their "ideal vision".

They are beneath contempt, and those who went out of their way encouraging people not to vote for Hillary in 20216 should never be given seat at the table again.

Our Democracy is on its last legs because some people were careless enough to listen to those FOOLS!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump leans in on a major 2026 issue: possibly replacing Justices Alito and Thomas [View all] Dulcinea Thursday OP

Do they need 60 votes in the Senate to confirm? Bluestocking Thursday #1

No JBTaurus83 Thursday #2

51. If either Justice died after January 2026, no_hypocrisy Thursday #5

Epstein. marble falls Thursday #3

Democratic Senate Candidates displacedvermoter Thursday #4

It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron Fiendish Thingy Thursday #6

A worse person than those two pwb Thursday #7

That was my reaction after seeing the headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Thursday #10

They found Kavanaugh. eggplant Thursday #11

Probably Cannon and Bondi..... Bettie Yesterday #22

he doesn't need worse, just younger Oliver Bolliver Butt Thursday #15

- Lemon Lyman Thursday #20

If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized... TheWaywardTarheel Thursday #8

Ideal outcome... homegirl Thursday #9

I'd really like to share that article, but it's behind a paywall. Sogo Thursday #12

We need a super majority! BidenRocks Thursday #13

He just wants to say he appointed to new justices jgmiller Thursday #14

"Piggy couched his comments MorbidButterflyTat Thursday #16

I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off calimary Thursday #17

He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long. ShazzieB Thursday #19

No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years." ShazzieB Thursday #18

Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT? lostincalifornia Thursday #21