Editorials & Other Articles

But it seem that an accusation has to be specific enough that a defendant can understand it and defend against it for there to be due process. But the indictment filed doesn't make sense.

Now insiders are saying person one is Hillary Clinton, and that person three is Richman. But the leak to Richman was Comey's memos about when Trump tried to get him to look the other way on an investigation into Michael Flynn, who lied about contact with the Russians. But that has nothing to do with Hillary, so it doesn't fit.

The other time that is might be that Comey authorized FBI agent Andrew McCabe to leak. But Comey didn't even meet with McCabe until after McCabe talked with the press, so Comey could not have authorized it. And the subject matter didn't involve Hillary.

Perhaps there was some other time we don't know about when Richman leaked something about Hillary but Richman says Comey never authorized any him to leak anything.

So at the very least the Trump cabal should be force to say exactly who, what and when or the case should be thrown out.. One cannot defend against an accusation if they don't know what it is.