Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,654 posts)
8. I think complaints to the FCC are in order
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:22 PM
Mar 2012

I filed a complaint with the FCC, and encourage others to do the same. Find out what station carries Rush in your area, what network they belong to, and when they run Rush (you’ll need this information to file the complaint.)

Then, file a complaint, based on Indecent or Profane programming.

http://www.fcc.gov/guides/obscenity-indecency-and-profanity

[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Obscenity, Indecency and Profanity[/font]

[font size=4]It’s Against the Law[/font]

[font size=3]It is a violation of federal law to air obscene programming at any time. It is also a violation of federal law to air indecent programming or profane language during certain hours. Congress has given the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the responsibility for administratively enforcing these laws. The FCC may revoke a station license, impose a monetary forfeiture or issue a warning if a station airs obscene, indecent or profane material.



[font size=4]Indecent Broadcast Restrictions[/font]

The FCC has defined broadcast indecency as “language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities.” Indecent programming contains patently offensive sexual or excretory material that does not rise to the level of obscenity.

The courts have held that indecent material is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely. It may, however, be restricted in order to avoid its broadcast during times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.

Consistent with a federal indecency statute and federal court decisions interpreting the statute, the Commission adopted a rule that broadcasts -- both on television and radio -- that fit within the indecency definition and that are aired between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. are prohibited and subject to indecency enforcement action.

[font size=4]Profane Broadcast Restrictions[/font]

The FCC has defined profanity as “including language so grossly offensive to members of the public who actually hear it as to amount to a nuisance.”

Like indecency, profane speech is prohibited on broadcast radio and television between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

…[/font][/font]




http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202290008
[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Limbaugh: Student Denied Spot At Contraception Hearing Says "She Must Be Paid To Have Sex," So She's A "Slut" And "Prostitute"[/font]

February 29, 2012 2:46 pm ET

[font size=3]From the February 29 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

…[/font][/font]



http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203010013
[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Limbaugh: Sandra Fluke Is "Having So Much Sex, It's Amazing She Can Still Walk"[/font]

March 01, 2012 3:52 pm ET

[font size=3]From the March 1 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

…[/font][/font]



http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203020013
[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Limbaugh: Fluke Said She's "Having Sex So Frequently That She Can't Afford All The Birth Control Pills That She Needs"[/font]

March 02, 2012 3:13 pm ET

[font size=3]From the March 2 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

…[/font][/font]



http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203020013
[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Limbaugh Further Denigrates Fluke, Saying She Has Boyfriends "Lined Up Around The Block. They Would Have Been In My Day"[/font]

March 02, 2012 3:33 pm ET

[font size=3]From the March 2 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

…[/font][/font]



Seriously, if a “fleeting expletive” at the Emmys led to an FCC crackdown, how about an ongoing line of character assasination, libel and the intentional use of vulgar language?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They're dropping like flies! MADem Mar 2012 #1
Thanks! This article from Media Life is even more damning... gvstn Mar 2012 #2
His poor.... Aviation Pro Mar 2012 #3
His "Income" liberalmike27 Mar 2012 #12
Thomas Jefferson faced the same frustration in his day. OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #14
That second paragraph??? DeSwiss Mar 2012 #18
Sadly, Jefferson had little to do with Constitution ;) OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #26
His wealth is going to take a hit... Aviation Pro Mar 2012 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author allan01 Mar 2012 #4
WE need to push them to drop Clear Channel all together. Vincardog Mar 2012 #5
I think complaints to the FCC are in order OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #8
There are huge problems with "Clear Channel" itself. It's right,proto-military defense organization? Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #16
BANE Capitol owns them. Mitt Richy Rich Rommney owns a large piece of Bane Capitol. Vincardog Mar 2012 #17
Yikes! A real RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY? Clear Channel, the right wing propoganda/takeover channel? Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #21
"Overwhelmingly Republican Military"??? unionworks Mar 2012 #36
80% of active military troops self-identify as Republican. Especially since the end of the draft. Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #38
source please unionworks Mar 2012 #39
Yes, 80% was certainly overstated, however military members are more likely to be Republican OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #41
They are almost there without our help Brother Buzz Mar 2012 #33
I think a lot of companies were looking for a reason to drop Rush Botany Mar 2012 #6
I think so too zipplewrath Mar 2012 #15
The count is up to 43 deacon_sephiroth Mar 2012 #7
I'm afraid ThinkProgress is overcounting OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #9
awww, poo deacon_sephiroth Mar 2012 #10
I was thinking of that this morning. Wait Wut Mar 2012 #11
Grateful? CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #22
I'm personally not in the market for a John Deere. Wait Wut Mar 2012 #24
Righto CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #28
People need to contact the local stations that carry him. Bonhomme Richard Mar 2012 #13
I agree, BR spiderpig Mar 2012 #19
Put it in writing. CC it to the FCC. mac56 Mar 2012 #34
Lifelock still advertising "Rush as spokesperson" and Geico, Granger, Demonaut Mar 2012 #20
This is amazing! christx30 Mar 2012 #23
I guess I shouldn't have expected an immediate response from advertizers. Kalidurga Mar 2012 #25
Having had something to do with buying radio ads on occasion… OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #27
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #29
You’re welcome OKIsItJustMe Mar 2012 #30
Rush says he hasn't lost a single "sponsor", nor have station affiliates lost a single dime. DeschutesRiver Mar 2012 #31
Obama should buy his advertising slots. Fuddnik Mar 2012 #32
18,000 advertisers? Sure, Rush. emulatorloo Mar 2012 #40
Wow. Is this finally it for El Rushbo? Gman Mar 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»More sponsors yank ads fr...»Reply #8