Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

chia

(2,870 posts)
26. Possible back door to the SAVE act:
Fri Jul 10, 2026, 02:32 PM
Friday
Skeptics will try to tamp down fears by saying the EAC is toothless, and on the surface they have a point. The commission can’t compel states to do anything, necessarily. It certifies voting machines, distributes election security grants, and publishes best practices. Hell, it even sat without a quorum for years during the Obama administration, and elections happened anyway.

Yet even though I’ve described it that way myself, “toothless” misses a key element that I think the White House is considering homing in on. The EAC holds one power that matters enormously right now. It controls the federal voter registration form.

That should set off alarm bells. Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (what experts call the “Motor Voter” law), there’s a single federal mail-in registration form that nearly every state is required to accept. The EAC maintains that form. Back in 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that states can’t unilaterally bolt new requirements onto that form, like a documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement, without the EAC’s permission. Which means whoever controls the EAC controls whether new requirements get added. . . .


. . . . the plaintiffs are ready. I suspect lawsuits are being drafted as I write this. Some of the same groups we’ve funded at DEFIANCE to help sue the Trump administration over unconstitutional conduct are probably preparing legal briefs this very morning. I know state attorneys general are gearing up, too. When I say that we’re better prepared for these types of anti-democratic shenanigans than we were the last time, this is what I mean.

Trump may think he found a Trojan horse. What he actually found is a trap of his own making. Every action he tries to take to abuse the EAC will be met with resistance and tie him up in litigation as the clock ticks to November. The president’s corruption may be brazen, but it’s also sloppy and short-sighted. And we’re going to keep fighting it in the courts, in the states, and in the open, where schemes like this one go to die.




https://www.defiance.news/p/trump-thinks-he-found-a-trojan-horse

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Causes chaos. Creates chaos. underpants Thursday #1
I feel sick. orangecrush Thursday #4
What specific outcome of this action do you anticipate? Fiendish Thingy Thursday #8
The electoral commision orangecrush Friday #15
Makes it easier for who to manipulate results? Fiendish Thingy Friday #21
Agree orangecrush Friday #23
Possible back door to the SAVE act: chia Friday #26
Found this orangecrush Friday #20
I sincerely hope that Janbdwl72 Friday #13
This was done with intention and forethought.. Klarkashton Thursday #2
I think the states will have fair elections................. Lovie777 Thursday #3
I sincerely hope you're right orangecrush Thursday #5
All states blue or red need to follow Newsome's bluestarone Thursday #6
I sure hope they do. orangecrush Friday #16
This isn't the states' first rodeo Fiendish Thingy Thursday #7
So many races in this election are going to be decided by lawsuits (like everything else nowadays) due to Republicans Karasu Thursday #9
Could it be possible that they plan on doing something illegal just to bluestarone Thursday #10
Absolutely orangecrush Friday #17
Jan Psaki had a election professional on that was concerned, but having done.... electric_blue68 Friday #11
More: littlemissmartypants Friday #12
He does not have unfettered authority to appoint replacements onenote Friday #14
That information is appreciated orangecrush Friday #19
Perhaps... littlemissmartypants Friday #22
Repubs control the senate too so l don't understand how you think that will help questionseverything Friday #28
It's a question of timing. As stated in the language from the relevant statute: onenote Friday #29
Maybe his goal is to have the seats empty...who knows questionseverything Friday #30
Thank you orangecrush Friday #18
Thank The Supreme Court DrFunkenstein Friday #24
They want to create as much chaos as possible next step jgmiller Friday #25
You aren't being paranoid orangecrush Friday #27
I've lost count of the number of times someone on DU has predicted Trump is about to declare "martial" law. onenote Friday #31
Ok maybe I shouldn't have said martial law but jgmiller Friday #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump fires last members ...»Reply #26