Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(52,900 posts)
37. Why is this so fucking hard.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 09:12 PM
7 hrs ago

In the last election, the American people took for granted that the Democratic party would still be around to uphold Social Security, food programs and also hold the line on Universal health programs. They took it for granted, which is why they voted for Republicans believing their talk track of a better economy. And then the grift began, and not only have Americans lost their safety nets, they're now seeing their tax dollars going to grifting projects. Bottomline, the party that they expected to provide the guardrails to stop the Republicans, were too weak in numbers to stop the massive mess we are in today.

So, this is so damn easy. The Democratic Party stands for Universal Healthcare, food programs, Social Security, Stronger education programs to support our diverse populations. Call yourselves whatever you fucking want to, but stand for these programs.

But here is the problem for Centrist Democrats: Those who are calling themselves Democratic Socialist are behind all these programs and once they come into office, they deliver. So you need to figure out what it is about Centrist Democrats that is undermining their success at the ballot boxes. Because, if they still think they can satisfy and cater to the corporations, and still do good on promises to the people, then maybe they deserve to lose. This combination of objectives hasn't worked in over twenty years.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uggh. Slotkin went on with Stephen A. Smith... hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #1
We all know she is right. Many here have agreed that Chuckee is a wet noodle. Just about anyone else would do a Exp 14 hrs ago #8
Which was not my point... clearly never even mentioned that. It was the venue. hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #10
Doesn't matter if she's on Fox or PBS, she's telling it like it is. She's always had a good message so going on any Exp 13 hrs ago #13
Again, NOT MY POINT. Clearly you know nothing about Stephen A. Smith. Bye. Done. hlthe2b 13 hrs ago #14
He's the Af-Am sports guy who gets political. I too think he's an idiot. But that doesn't matter. eom Exp 13 hrs ago #15
Who gives a rat's bum about Smith? Obviously she got the message out. And she is 100% right. flashman13 10 hrs ago #31
I also think that Ken Martin has not been an effective leader for the DNC. Lonestarblue 14 hrs ago #12
Post removed Post removed 13 hrs ago #17
Good call Mig popsdenver 11 hrs ago #30
I can't stand him kimbutgar 12 hrs ago #18
Our elected representatives should not live in bubbles Soul_of_Wit 12 hrs ago #19
So, not the point. Slotkin can go on any program, but she should not give him the attention hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #20
I apparently touched a nerve Soul_of_Wit 11 hrs ago #23
Post removed Post removed 11 hrs ago #24
This is a gratuitously nasty and arrogant response Akakoji 11 hrs ago #25
What a "polite" thing to say... hlthe2b 11 hrs ago #26
It apparently seems to work Akakoji 33 min ago #46
I share . . . Scubamatt 11 hrs ago #22
I often have that sentiment on these issues re:inner workings of the party Raven123 7 hrs ago #36
Looks like someone was not included dave99 14 hrs ago #2
I wholeheartedly agree awesomerwb1 14 hrs ago #3
Oh, hey, old buddy. blm 14 hrs ago #4
blm!!!! DrFunkenstein 14 hrs ago #6
😘 blm 14 hrs ago #7
is she volunteering to be the new leadership? msongs 14 hrs ago #5
She's got a ways to go given her yes vote on the Laken Riley Act. LuvLoogie 14 hrs ago #9
...not volunteering so much as lobbying to be it. LudwigPastorius 4 hrs ago #40
Slotkin is awesome. She was brave as a brand new Rep in Congress to vote for impeaching TSF. That was a biggie Exp 14 hrs ago #11
I'm guessing she wants to be majority leader Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #16
Me too Katcat 12 hrs ago #21
Looking at the results of the *past decade* not the past 1-2 years, that's a "no shit" conclusion. RockRaven 11 hrs ago #27
No kidding - these problems within the party should have been addressed at least 16 years ago. NT Midwestern Democrat 1 hr ago #45
Sorry To Inform You.... DAngelo136 11 hrs ago #28
Stephen A. Smith??? Cirsium 11 hrs ago #29
I agree Skittles 10 hrs ago #32
Power is hard to give up. Mark.b2 9 hrs ago #34
yeah, I know Skittles 6 hrs ago #39
"Strongly worded letters" didn't cut it Ponietz 10 hrs ago #33
Chuck and Hakeem beg to differ Charlie Chapulin 8 hrs ago #35
Why is this so fucking hard. Baitball Blogger 7 hrs ago #37
We don't cater to corporations creeksneakers2 1 hr ago #44
It's simple Magoo48 6 hrs ago #38
She's right. I don't disagree. lees1975 4 hrs ago #41
Please explain how leaders such as Schumer and Jeffries are to blame Akakoji 2 hrs ago #42
We need to concentrate on stopping Trump creeksneakers2 2 hrs ago #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Slotkin calls for 'new le...»Reply #37