Latest Breaking News

flashman13

(2,639 posts)

31. Who gives a rat's bum about Smith? Obviously she got the message out. And she is 100% right.

Fri Jun 26, 2026, 05:28 PM

11 hrs ago

We'll agree, Smith's a loser, but he has a platform on Sirius and a big audience. Use it. Next talk to Steve Schmidt, Meidas Touch, Rick Wilson, and Brian Tyler Cohen. Hammer this same message out on every venue possible.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Katcat Polybius Shipwack dexdah temporary311 BlueMTexpat

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Slotkin calls for 'new leadership' in the Democratic Party [View all] DrFunkenstein 15 hrs ago OP

Uggh. Slotkin went on with Stephen A. Smith... hlthe2b 15 hrs ago #1

We all know she is right. Many here have agreed that Chuckee is a wet noodle. Just about anyone else would do a Exp 15 hrs ago #8

Which was not my point... clearly never even mentioned that. It was the venue. hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #10

Doesn't matter if she's on Fox or PBS, she's telling it like it is. She's always had a good message so going on any Exp 14 hrs ago #13

Again, NOT MY POINT. Clearly you know nothing about Stephen A. Smith. Bye. Done. hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #14

He's the Af-Am sports guy who gets political. I too think he's an idiot. But that doesn't matter. eom Exp 14 hrs ago #15

Who gives a rat's bum about Smith? Obviously she got the message out. And she is 100% right. flashman13 11 hrs ago #31

I also think that Ken Martin has not been an effective leader for the DNC. Lonestarblue 14 hrs ago #12

Post removed Post removed 13 hrs ago #17

Good call Mig popsdenver 12 hrs ago #30

I can't stand him kimbutgar 13 hrs ago #18

Our elected representatives should not live in bubbles Soul_of_Wit 13 hrs ago #19

So, not the point. Slotkin can go on any program, but she should not give him the attention hlthe2b 13 hrs ago #20

I apparently touched a nerve Soul_of_Wit 12 hrs ago #23

Post removed Post removed 12 hrs ago #24

This is a gratuitously nasty and arrogant response Akakoji 12 hrs ago #25

What a "polite" thing to say... hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #26

It apparently seems to work Akakoji 1 hr ago #46

I share . . . Scubamatt 12 hrs ago #22

I often have that sentiment on these issues re:inner workings of the party Raven123 8 hrs ago #36

Looks like someone was not included dave99 15 hrs ago #2

I wholeheartedly agree awesomerwb1 15 hrs ago #3

Oh, hey, old buddy. blm 15 hrs ago #4

blm!!!! DrFunkenstein 15 hrs ago #6

😘 blm 15 hrs ago #7

is she volunteering to be the new leadership? msongs 15 hrs ago #5

She's got a ways to go given her yes vote on the Laken Riley Act. LuvLoogie 14 hrs ago #9

...not volunteering so much as lobbying to be it. LudwigPastorius 5 hrs ago #40

Slotkin is awesome. She was brave as a brand new Rep in Congress to vote for impeaching TSF. That was a biggie Exp 14 hrs ago #11

I'm guessing she wants to be majority leader Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #16

Me too Katcat 13 hrs ago #21

Looking at the results of the *past decade* not the past 1-2 years, that's a "no shit" conclusion. RockRaven 12 hrs ago #27

No kidding - these problems within the party should have been addressed at least 16 years ago. NT Midwestern Democrat 2 hrs ago #45

Sorry To Inform You.... DAngelo136 12 hrs ago #28

Stephen A. Smith??? Cirsium 12 hrs ago #29

I agree Skittles 11 hrs ago #32

Power is hard to give up. Mark.b2 10 hrs ago #34

yeah, I know Skittles 7 hrs ago #39

"Strongly worded letters" didn't cut it Ponietz 11 hrs ago #33

Chuck and Hakeem beg to differ Charlie Chapulin 9 hrs ago #35

Why is this so fucking hard. Baitball Blogger 8 hrs ago #37

We don't cater to corporations creeksneakers2 2 hrs ago #44

It's simple Magoo48 7 hrs ago #38

She's right. I don't disagree. lees1975 5 hrs ago #41

Please explain how leaders such as Schumer and Jeffries are to blame Akakoji 3 hrs ago #42

We need to concentrate on stopping Trump creeksneakers2 3 hrs ago #43