Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,738 posts)
13. Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:14 PM
Sunday

Given the outrageous ruling by SCOTUS, the GO P actions taken in Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama, these steps are appropriate. The GOP cannot claim clean hands given the steps taken by SCOTUS and these states.

Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report

DO IT! Get creatove Dems. No shame. No "but my precious decorum". Fight. The. Fascists. #Virginia

www.rawstory.com/virginia-red...

br00t4c (@br00t4c.bsky.social) 2026-05-10T19:51:47.254Z

https://www.rawstory.com/virginia-redistricting-2676875271/

Congressional Democrats are quietly kicking around a long-shot scheme to clear out Virginia's entire Supreme Court, which just torched their gerrymandered congressional map.

During a private Saturday call that included Virginia's Democratic House delegation and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), lawmakers vented over Friday's ruling and floated what The New York Times described as "an audacious and possibly far-fetched idea" to replace every sitting justice and reinstate their map, according to a Sunday report.

The scheme includes lowering the mandatory judicial retirement age from 75 to 54 — the age of the youngest current justice — forcing all seven off the bench. Virginia judges are appointed by the Democratic-controlled General Assembly, which could then stack the court with friendly replacements.

"The conversation reflected the desperation and fury that have gripped the party after the state Supreme Court struck down a favorable map that had been ratified by voters," the Times wrote, calling the mass ouster the "most dramatic idea they discussed."

The idea reportedly drew "mixed reactions" on the call, and Democrats did not land on a path forward. Gov. Abigail Spanberger has not been briefed, her spokeswoman told the Times. Former Rep. James Moran (D-VA) warned the gambit would be "just a bridge too far" and could backfire.

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), who was on the call, told the Times he supports doing whatever is necessary, adding: "Everyone has got to have a strong stomach right now; this is a complete disaster waiting to happen if people are timid."

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As the kids say, Do It! Do It! Do It! Chasstev365 Sunday #1
I'm equally angry, but is there no alternative solution? This freaks me out--especially with the timing. hlthe2b Sunday #2
When faced with an existential threat, tomorrow can wait. paleotn Sunday #17
SCOTUS went nuclear first Bobstandard Sunday #28
GOP SCOTUS went nuclear with in 2000 with Bush vs Gore ruling DemocracyForever Yesterday #34
Valid argument. We weren't first to act. paleotn Yesterday #46
I have great doubts about whether Gov Spanberger would go for it. scipan Sunday #29
A Private Call Reveals Democrats' Desperation Over Tossing of Map (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #3
Original title: Fiendish Thingy Sunday #4
Speaking as a Virginia Democrat" AverageOldGuy Sunday #5
This orangecrush Sunday #24
We don't have to do any of that to achieve new lines for 2028 FBaggins Sunday #27
That's a mistake, IMHO RussBLib Sunday #6
My thinking, Give the Virginia SC ONE warning that this is what will be done if they refuse. BUT bluestarone Sunday #7
Virginia Supreme , intelpug Yesterday #37
If they fucking refuse what? They already made their fucking horseshit ruling. Warning time is motherfucking over. SoFlaBro Yesterday #53
When republicans pull similar actions to combat Democrats, their members don't worry about it, they just do it. MLWR Sunday #8
They're doing that in Iowa too Bettie Yesterday #42
Whether they should do it or not... DET Sunday #9
Democrats need to start taking bold and decisive actions. magicarpet Sunday #10
That is your perception Boo1 Sunday #31
what if the new court rules the same? msongs Sunday #11
Make sure it doesn't. paleotn Sunday #16
what if the new court rules the differently? Torchlight Yesterday #41
Think about what happens if we let the GOP redistricting advantage cost us the House. SamuelAdams Sunday #12
Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #13
Bottom line, if Democrats have any political courage at all, they will tear it down and then rebuild PatrickforB Sunday #14
Flip the script. Rethugs would start doing this Monday 8am. NoMoreRepugs Sunday #15
give it a go, magats would DoBW Sunday #18
Do it! nt in2herbs Sunday #19
Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures. If we don't take the house back in November, we lose our demcracy. Fil1957 Sunday #20
Just do whatever Republicans would do and tell everyone to f**k off. rickford66 Sunday #21
Is this really dramatic? Zelda_Orchid Sunday #22
DO IT DO IT DO IT orangecrush Sunday #23
That's a pretty aggressive proposal. NH Ethylene Sunday #25
Ohio Repugs ignored their state supreme court when it came to redistricting mikewv Sunday #26
Mike Dewine specifically multiple times... OhioBack2Blue Yesterday #38
They should follow West Virginia's example. Lasher Sunday #30
well there's Spanberger, Ms bipartisan. and IF they can't cheat, we scipan Sunday #32
I hope they find a way to make lemonade out of this lemon juice. COL Mustard Sunday #33
My prediction LPBBEAR Yesterday #35
You made your ruling now enforce it! bluestateboomer Yesterday #36
Dems cry saying they are "playing by the rules" OhioBack2Blue Yesterday #39
Maybe I am missing something dsc Yesterday #40
Would require constitutional amendment Shrek Yesterday #45
OK that makes sense dsc Yesterday #47
It isn't "pushing through a gerrymandered map," intheflow Yesterday #43
This isn't the first time that a constitutional amendment passed by voters was overturned by courts. MichMan Yesterday #44
That was the national court dsc Yesterday #48
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Yesterday #51
Test Run Kid Berwyn Yesterday #49
Trump Wins Big as Virginia Dems Won't Go Nuclear to Save 4 House Seats LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #50
If we lose by a few votes duckworth969 Yesterday #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Furious Democrats Reporte...»Reply #13