Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

agingdem

(8,948 posts)

4. I could be wrong (sarcasm!) but

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun May 10, 2026, 03:18 PM

Yesterday

isn't that the same NATO Trump called a "paper tiger"/demanded the organization pay their "fair share"/threatened withdrawal?.........and now Trump clown Waltz is begging the "no relevance" NATO to condemn the Iranian government's restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz when there were no restrictions prior to Trump's disastrous vanity war...Insanity rules!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dave99

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Waltz says US pushing for UN resolution on Iranian actions in Strait of Hormuz [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

There will be little support for this WSHazel Yesterday #1

I doubt that, most of Asia desperately needs that oil to flow out of the Gulf EX500rider Yesterday #3

Asia already has work arounds. The China Flag. dave99 Yesterday #5

Sink the United States how exactly? EX500rider Yesterday #6

shitstain is in charge of US Military, do you need anything else ? dave99 Yesterday #7

A incompetent Commander in Chief doesn't make the US military any less lethal EX500rider Yesterday #9

Do not need to dave99 Yesterday #11

Trump has created the blockade WSHazel Yesterday #12

Actually Iran started with the closing of the straight except for their vessels EX500rider Yesterday #13

The U.S. attacked Iran WSHazel Yesterday #14

US and Iran fighting should have zero to do with international traffic in international waters EX500rider Yesterday #15

I mean, it's not like we're the aggressors at this point in time sakabatou Yesterday #2

I could be wrong (sarcasm!) but agingdem Yesterday #4

Trump should check with his boss first whether Russia would veto it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #8

You mean Bibi durablend 15 hrs ago #16

Well, I meant Putin - I don't think Bibi has any influence on Russia's veto muriel_volestrangler 15 hrs ago #17

But Iran was saying that all shipping not bound for their attackers (US and Israel) could pass through. ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #10

And yet.... EX500rider 4 hrs ago #18