Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(171,972 posts)
Sun May 10, 2026, 10:38 AM Sunday

Private Jack Smith remarks spur report he could drop 'unreleased evidence' against Trump [View all]

Source: Raw Story

May 10, 2026 8:16AM ET


Jack Smith is reportedly sending a message to President Donald Trump: even as he faces the prospect of prosecution, he still possesses weaponizable information that could damage the president.

Speaking at a private event at the Cosmos Club in Washington on April 20, Smith indicated his readiness to take on potential charges and signaled he could deploy unreleased evidence should Trump move forward with retaliatory prosecution, according to video of the event obtained by The New York Times. "But unlike others targeted by Mr. Trump, Mr. Smith still could inflict damage on the president by revealing unreleased evidence. He appears unfazed by the prospect of shifting from accuser to accused," the Times reported.

The implicit threat underscores the precarious position of both men: Trump is demanding Smith's prosecution, but doing so risks Smith going public with material that could prove damaging to the president. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former lead defense lawyer, now controls whether to bring charges, a potential conflict of interest that intensifies the political stakes.

Previously, the White House successfully blocked the release of a section of Smith's final report on the Mar-a-Lago documents case that "might have reminded the public of the evidence used to bolster the indictment," according to the Times.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/jack-smith-2676874374/



Link to NYT article - Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. ‘Corrupted’ by Trump and His Allies
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don't tease us... Funtatlaguy Sunday #1
I Agree, Endless Teasing & Not Much Action WiVoter Sunday #18
He can't unilaterally decide to release the evidence InstantGratification Sunday #31
I believe the time is coming when an avalanche of previously withheld and/or hidden liberalla Sunday #33
I hope you're right. calimary Monday #45
"...material that could prove damaging to the president." J_William_Ryan Sunday #2
Why has this information NOT been released to the public already? Bluetus Sunday #6
Much of it was sealed by Judge Cannon Nt Fiendish Thingy Sunday #35
She can't seal the world. Bluetus Sunday #40
She sealed his report Fiendish Thingy Sunday #41
It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November. BadgerMom Monday #44
Bring it on, Jack Smith! Let's hear all of it ... unredacted FakeNoose Sunday #3
Just think. relogic Sunday #7
He needs a safety switch. multigraincracker Sunday #16
All that information popsdenver Sunday #21
Don't hold your breath, not goona happen. Btw, source is raw story. msfiddlestix Sunday #36
Not when it's published in the New York Times first ... Raw Story is reprinting the NYT story FakeNoose Sunday #37
Did Raw Story actually republish the New York Times story, or did they write a version with a certain spin that stretche msfiddlestix Monday #47
Do it! sheshe2 Sunday #4
If he has further evidence, he should release it. JohnnyRingo Sunday #5
Mueller orangecrush Sunday #8
Why wait????? The way to stop a predator is to strike first and hard. Ford_Prefect Sunday #9
Don't think this is the man trump wants to mess with. republianmushroom Sunday #10
Ewwwww Just Jerome Sunday #20
Why not? The old one sin't working too good: 3Hotdogs Sunday #26
Why "private" is part of the title? What am I missing? question everything Sunday #11
He is a private individual now, no longer employed by the public/government. nt SunSeeker Sunday #13
The remarks were made in private? liberalla Sunday #25
A private event. Invited guests only I would surmise. AZ8theist Sunday #27
Mr. Smith should hire bodyguards Bayard Sunday #12
It's not just popsdenver Sunday #22
Is that a bone spur report? generalbetrayus Sunday #14
I've often wondered why Trump has not had to deal with leaks Nixie Sunday #15
He is insulated popsdenver Sunday #24
SOMEONE has to have some guts and get the truth out. johnnyplankton Sunday #17
I believe that Jack Smith has the integrity to do it FakeNoose Sunday #42
So why didn't he release it before the presidential election?? mucifer Sunday #19
He would have been breaking the law FakeNoose Sunday #43
If he's prosecuted for illegally investigating trump radical noodle Sunday #23
Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald. Joinfortmill Sunday #28
So he'll drop this stuff only to help himself? johnp3907 Sunday #29
Just do it. Piecemeal it if you want but just get it out thete Deuxcents Sunday #30
At first I thought Jack Smith had enlisted in the army with the rank of Private Redleg Sunday #32
More Raw Story bullshit.... reACTIONary Sunday #34
MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #38
Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #39
Jack Smith.... MarcoZandrini Monday #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Private Jack Smith remark...