Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(171,529 posts)

2. Two

Reply to eppur_se_muova (Reply #1)

Mon May 4, 2026, 06:30 PM

8 hrs ago

From the OP article -

(snip)

The prizes covered President Donald Trump’s first year back in the White House, and two winning entries focused on his pulverizing approach to norms and constraints. The Times took the investigative reporting prize for exploring Trump’s boundary-pushing approach to the notion of conflicts of interest. Reuters, which won for national reporting, looked at how Trump has used the federal government and his supporters’ influence to expand presidential authority and to try to punish his foes, the award judges noted.

(snip)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AP, Washington Post, Reuters and Minnesota Star Tribune among Pulitzer winners for 2025 work [View all] BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago OP

How many were for investigating Trumpian malfeasance ? nt eppur_se_muova 8 hrs ago #1

Two BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #2

Thanks. Maybe that's really all the MSM has been providing in terms of meaningful coverage. nt eppur_se_muova 7 hrs ago #3