Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ihaveaquestion

(4,644 posts)
7. I listened to most of the SC arguments and then reread Kraznov's XO and...
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 01:21 PM
Wednesday

I don't think anyone sufficiently addressed the obvious flaw in the XO as I read it... The 14th uses the phrase "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " and then proceeds to exclude all children of non-citizens as if they are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. Lots of talk around domiciles and allegiance, but nothing on whether U.S. jurisdiction applies.

This makes no sense to me - aside from diplomats, how the heck does U.S. jurisdiction not apply to non-citizens?

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's lawyer faces push...»Reply #7