Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Energy Secretary Wright says U.S. 'not ready' to escort tankers through Strait of Hormuz yet [View all]flashman13
(2,341 posts)20. No they won't. The military situation is the same for everyone. Iran owns the Straits of Hormuz.
However, that being said, nothing prevents other countries from striking deals with Iran to allow their ships to transit the Straits. The Iranians have given their own ships and Chinese ships safe passage through the Straits. Of course those ships are loading Iranian oil. The rest of the Gulf states are under the guns of the Iranians and are shut down for the immediate future.
Your pun for the day: Iran is in the driver's seat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Energy Secretary Wright says U.S. 'not ready' to escort tankers through Strait of Hormuz yet [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Thursday
OP
Enough unless the Iranians launch a mass drone swarm and the ship runs out of ammunition before the
flashman13
Thursday
#12
Wait another week or two other countries wil be stepping into escort their own tankers
EX500rider
Thursday
#14
No they won't. The military situation is the same for everyone. Iran owns the Straits of Hormuz.
flashman13
Thursday
#20
There are two possibilities here. They have already cut a deal with Iran or their ships will be sunk.
flashman13
Thursday
#31
"The reality is that none of those 76 destroyers are available." They can be.
EX500rider
Thursday
#24
So your answer is to provide more targets. Numbers and brute force can not negate the defensive
flashman13
Thursday
#37
They can also create distance at the narrowst place the straight is 21 Mi wide but the channel runs down the middle
EX500rider
Thursday
#38
This was posted earlier by someone else but it's an amazing watch, 32 minutes long
wolfie001
Thursday
#4
Well, the lack of shipping right now is an indication of a breakdown somewhere in the defense chain
wolfie001
Thursday
#27
The US destroyer and mine sweeper vessels will take some time to get there from all around the globe
EX500rider
Thursday
#28
When Donald is long gone, buried beneath the 18th hole somewhere, the Stooges will claim the spoils as rulers.
usonian
Thursday
#35
It's not that they're busy as much as they haven't quite figured out how much to charge per transit...
EarthFirst
Thursday
#11
I call them sitting ducks because the is very little room for mobility and they are close to land on both sides.
Martin68
Thursday
#44
If you destroy "the manufacturing industry that supplies their offensive capabilities"
bucolic_frolic
Thursday
#29
Encouraging vessels to just go for it is insane. But that's where we are under Orange Julius. n/t
Evolve Dammit
Thursday
#42