Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(110,237 posts)
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 02:05 AM Yesterday

Epstein files contain explicit but unsubstantiated claim that Trump abused minor [View all]

Source: The Guardian

Three memos that describe four interviews conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2019 contain explicit but unsubstantiated claims that Donald Trump sexually abused a woman when she was a minor in the early 1980s with the assistance of Jeffrey Epstein, according to a Guardian review of those documents.

The Department of Justice did not release those records when it uploaded millions of pages of files related to Epstein beginning in December. The existence of the missing documents was first reported by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger and subsequently confirmed by NPR, causing outrage in Washington and sparking an investigation from congressional Democrats.

The Guardian obtained the missing FBI form 302 reports, which memorialize 25 pages of agents’ notes from the four interviews conducted in the summer and fall of 2019. The notes describe how the woman came forward to tell agents she recognized Epstein from a photo sent by a childhood friend. Only the first session, in which she did not name Trump, made it into the public release. The Guardian has chosen not to publish the woman’s name.

Her allegations have not been verified, and the FBI never brought charges related to her claims, which at times appear outlandish. Her statements also contradict what is known about Epstein’s life in the early 1980s. The millions of investigative documents released by the DoJ have contained explosive allegations that have led to resignations and arrests, but also specious claims that have later proven false. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing related to Epstein, and said last week: “I did nothing.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/trump-epstein-files-fbi



The big news is that the UK's The Guardian has actually "obtained" and "reviewed" the missing FBI reports.

The Guardian reports that "at times" the claims "appear outlandish" -- and "contradict what is known about Epstein’s life in the early 1980s." How much longer can Trump prevent the reports from being made available to the public?
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A witness statement IS substantiation. Why is it so "outlandlish" to believe pedophiles would do this? SunSeeker Yesterday #1
If you read Sollenberger's article, it is suggested that this victim is the same one mentioned here AZJonnie Yesterday #6
What parent let's a 13 year old fly off wnylib Yesterday #21
Agree, and at the very least, the 'multiple times' makes me really question it AZJonnie Yesterday #25
If we had all the details from that girl's statements wnylib Yesterday #31
The UK Guardian has the interviews. When their tone is like it is in this article AZJonnie 11 hrs ago #33
No need to explain the Guardian's political slant to me. wnylib 10 hrs ago #34
We do need to see them, on this point we agree AZJonnie 9 hrs ago #35
More media bullshit ("substantiation") Bluetus Yesterday #22
We're talking about a guy who's daughter barely escaped his predation Xipe Totec Yesterday #2
based on the lengths Trump is going to, to distract from these files Skittles Yesterday #3
Funny, you don't hear him complaining about "Epstein Epstein Epstein" BWdem4life Yesterday #4
If you read the whole article, the claims unfortunately do sound a bit sketchy AZJonnie Yesterday #5
the article does paint her as very sketchy, with some criminal activity in recent years LymphocyteLover Yesterday #10
It's confusing because the Guardian article suggests she dropped the suit AZJonnie Yesterday #24
Good point. I think there is a lot of conflicitng info on this person, perhaps put out intentionally, perhaps because LymphocyteLover Yesterday #30
Roll the snuff films Whip-poor-will Yesterday #7
Welcome to DU ! KS Toronado Yesterday #13
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #28
Even the "appearence of an impropriety" is bad enough. Hieronymus Phact Yesterday #8
there were 4 minors who accused the orange pedo. Javaman Yesterday #9
and The Guardian is saying they've seen these 3 transcripts or notes and they are not as damning as we might like LymphocyteLover Yesterday #11
I wonder if this was the young woman who settled a claim with the Epstein estate. As I recall, there Vinca Yesterday #12
Have the DOJ or the Republicans who control congress even tried to contact this person everyonematters Yesterday #14
"Unsubstantiated claims"? Has The Guardian Never Heard Of "Circumstantial ColoringFool Yesterday #15
Odd how the victim's name was published. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #16
So the White House's fall back position is going to be this is really just unsubstantiated allegations? Botany Yesterday #17
It's a crime to file a false FBI report. Six117 Yesterday #18
So she had a small criminal history so the victim deniers are out in force. travelingthrulife Yesterday #19
If there is ONE there is a bluestarone Yesterday #20
interview the survivors azureblue Yesterday #23
Don't want to beat up . . . Scubamatt Yesterday #26
I'd like to ask people who consider the claims BlueKota Yesterday #27
Notice he hasn't sued anyone who has made these claims yet. ificandream Yesterday #29
DISCOVERY Bluetus Yesterday #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Epstein files contain exp...