Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jerry2144

(3,228 posts)
4. passive sampling?
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 11:50 AM
12 hrs ago

How would that even work if you are the designated driver and your passengers are like Kegsbreath or Pirro? The false positives could be more deadly than the small risk they're managing. And a false negative would open the door for liability of the car manufacturer, "Why did the car you manufactured fail to stop Kegsbreath from driving drunk?" would be a cause of many lawsuits, as well. Most people do not drive drunk or impaired. This sounds like a solution in search of a problem that is relatively low probability.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mandatory driver impairme...»Reply #4