Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blumancru

(238 posts)
40. The Feds have no authority in elections
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 06:47 AM
6 hrs ago

It falls to the individual states. The states that will honor this Executive Order are states that vote red anyway. I don’t think this will have much effect.
Interesting and a little off subject that there is nothing in the constitution requiring a popular vote for president. The states can choose the electors any way they want to. The legislature can appoint them or whatever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Doesn't work like that....... Lovie777 19 hrs ago #1
Different effect Lithos 17 hrs ago #21
Either way, we MUST educate the public and especially the MEDIA. That is not how EOs work. Bluetus 15 hrs ago #31
I like your words, which are true. chouchou 14 hrs ago #34
Yes, nicely defined Roy Rolling 8 hrs ago #39
And I should have mentioned the big 2 Bluetus 1 hr ago #43
Executive orders are worthless for making laws about elections MacKasey 19 hrs ago #2
all laws or orders are as effective as the ability to enforce them quakerboy 16 hrs ago #24
What if the SC's six sycophants BlueKota 16 hrs ago #28
He has "searched the depths of Legal Arguments" livetohike 19 hrs ago #3
Right! If his sycophantic "aides" in legal matters didn't tell him Justice matters. 11 hrs ago #37
The federal government does not control state elections or id requirements for the states... wcmagumba 19 hrs ago #4
Let's think positive. He may, well, you know. twodogsbarking 19 hrs ago #5
I know for sure, from all my friends here that what TSF is saying is bluestarone 19 hrs ago #6
"researched the depths of legal arguments not yet articulated or vetted." onenote 19 hrs ago #7
No there won't. Shut the fuck up, Donnie. paleotn 19 hrs ago #8
Impotent POTUS says what? Fiendish Thingy 19 hrs ago #9
unfortunately voter ID is popular. just what kind is the sticking point. here in hawaii one has to provide ID to msongs 19 hrs ago #10
Here in Philly BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #14
In January, trump's March executive order on elections was struck down LetMyPeopleVote 18 hrs ago #11
The Constitution blocks presidents from changing election rules. LetMyPeopleVote 18 hrs ago #12
It takes one to know one Puppyjive 18 hrs ago #13
Just like it's the Gulf of America whether Congress wants it or not. JohnnyRingo 18 hrs ago #15
Google uses it Polybius 17 hrs ago #20
Yeah, and fuck them for that. I've avoided using google since they capitulated to the orange POS POTUS LymphocyteLover 17 hrs ago #23
Same! n/t pazzyanne 15 hrs ago #32
Google has monopoly suits against them. JohnnyRingo 4 hrs ago #41
It might not work that way but this will be his rationale for having ICE disrupt elections in Blue states and cities. ChicagoTeamster 18 hrs ago #16
Judgment is coming, Mr. Trump Prairie Gates 17 hrs ago #17
"...laying out the 'legal reasons' for national voter-identification requirements." BaronChocula 17 hrs ago #18
Trump could not possibly have written that post. There are far too many multi syllable words in it. flashman13 17 hrs ago #19
Stephen Miller must be blowing smoke up his ass again Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 17 hrs ago #22
I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, 3825-87867 16 hrs ago #25
Whatever Happened to STATES RIGHTS Mr.Bee 16 hrs ago #26
Basically it's republican rights Tree Lady 11 hrs ago #38
The Sharpie he uses to sign it will be worth more than the EO. He ought to read the Constitution. Vinca 16 hrs ago #27
He thinks he is a king.... His dementia is getting worse. ashredux 16 hrs ago #29
Prepare for disruption of mid-term elections. thought crime 15 hrs ago #30
if this passes we need a GoFund Me to raise money to gopiscrap 15 hrs ago #33
How Would This Not Violate The 10th Amendment? DallasNE 14 hrs ago #35
It's a tantrum response to Thune telling him they don't have the votes to nuke the filibuster pat_k 12 hrs ago #36
The Feds have no authority in elections Blumancru 6 hrs ago #40
"Quiet! QUIET!! Piggy!!!" maxrandb 3 hrs ago #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says he will issue ...»Reply #40