Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,103 posts)
24. MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 03:14 PM
Yesterday

“If these f—ers think that they’re going to intimidate us and threaten and bully me into silence … they have another thing coming,” one Democrat said.

Dems enraged after Trump’s DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy - MS NOW

apple.news/AwXl5tcTUQx2...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-02-11T16:55:16.817Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/dems-enraged-after-trumps-doj-targeted-veterans-with-charges-of-seditious-conspiracy

In legal circles, it’s known as “no bill.” That’s the label used to describe what happens when prosecutors go to a grand jury to secure an indictment and jury members reject the effort.

If it seems as if the phrase has been coming up more frequently in recent months, it’s not your imagination. Donald Trump’s Justice Department has run into “no bill” setbacks repeatedly of late, in cases ranging from former FBI Director James Comey to New York Attorney General Letitia James to Sean Dunn (better known as the “sandwich guy”).

The latest example, however, is arguably the most dramatic: MS NOW reported that a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., has declined to indict at least two Democratic senators — Arizona’s Mark Kelly and Michigan’s Elissa Slotkin — on charges of seditious conspiracy......

That’s precisely what happened. As The New York Times summarized:

It was remarkable that the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington — led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trump’s — authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment. … But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trump’s bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.


That’s certainly correct, though I’d add that it’s also remarkable to note the crime that Trump’s DOJ accused the Democratic lawmakers of committing: Seditious conspiracy is a serious felony charge that’s rarely pursued. The idea that members of Congress crossed that line, and effectively conspired to undermine the authority of the government by reminding service members to follow the law and reject illegal orders, is insane......

Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, a decorated Army veteran who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan, was even more candid. “If these f–––ers think that they’re going to intimidate us and threaten and bully me into silence, and they’re going to go after political opponents and get us to back down, they have another thing coming,” Crow said. “The tide is turning.”

As for the party’s leadership, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries was also unreserved, declaring in a written statement: “The Grand Jury upheld and honored the Constitution, doing what Donald Trump and his corrupt Republican sycophants lack the character to do. The attempt to indict Members of Congress for exercising their constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights is another shameful example of the cancerous rot that engulfs the Trump administration.”

The New York Democrat concluded, “Donald Trump, Jeanine Pirro and the corrupt political hacks at the Department of Justice will not silence or intimidate us. Every attempt to weaponize the criminal justice system will only strengthen our resolve as we work to end the National nightmare that extreme MAGA Republicans are inflicting on the country. They will all be held accountable for their lawlessness.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another "Pirro Special". BumRushDaShow Tuesday #1
I think this is at least 15 failed indictments by her office underpants Yesterday #15
Found one from September that said "at least 11" (and that was for back then apparently starting in August) BumRushDaShow Yesterday #18
So this is at least 17. That's exactly the article I was looking for underpants Yesterday #19
And that's just out of that one office BumRushDaShow Yesterday #20
This pig should've been jailed for going 119 mph on a NY highway wolfie001 Tuesday #2
There's no comment because it was a lost cause from the start. Deuxcents Tuesday #3
I'm so old I can remember when we had a First Amendment that protected free speech. CaptainTruth Tuesday #4
And Pirro loses....again. MarineCombatEngineer Tuesday #5
Her losing makes my heart smile riversedge Yesterday #13
My count is 15 failed indictments...so far underpants Yesterday #16
Thank you citizens for recognizing a fraudulent charge mdbl Tuesday #6
Pirro is a drunk and an absolute disgrace. MuirHero Tuesday #7
it was never gonna happen Skittles Tuesday #8
She has to have set the record for failed federal grand jury indictments by now jgmiller Tuesday #9
Her batting average can't be all that great. MLWR Yesterday #14
15 by my count. underpants Yesterday #17
The ketchup will be flying tonight! Fil1957 Tuesday #10
I should have invested in catsup stock. joanbarnes Tuesday #11
This is fundamentally fascist - J_William_Ryan Yesterday #12
The regime had NO case to begin with... ProudMNDemocrat Yesterday #21
Where are Elmo and DOGE to put a stop to the money these people are wasting on frivolous lawsuits. travelingthrulife Yesterday #22
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription) LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #23
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #24
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #25
That was a foregone conclusion, BUT DJ Synikus Makisimus Yesterday #26
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #27
MaddowBlog-Democrats want to turn the tables on Pirro following failed indictment effort LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump administration fail...»Reply #24