Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(177,021 posts)23. Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription)
The rejection was a remarkable rebuke, suggesting that ordinary citizens did not believe that the lawmakers had committed any crimes.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/us/politics/trump-democrats-illegal-orders-pirro.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LVA.6CKn.AKtD2kERP9jk&smid=nytcore-ios-share
Federal prosecutors in Washington sought and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment against six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video this fall that enraged President Trump by reminding active-duty members of the military and intelligence community that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders, four people familiar with the matter said.
It was remarkable that the U.S. attorneys office in Washington led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trumps authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nations spy agencies.
But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trumps bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.
The move to charge the lawmakers among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trumps directives to prosecute his adversaries......
President Trump is using the F.B.I. as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress, the four House members who took part in the video said in a joint statement. No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.
Mr. Kelly is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as serious allegations of misconduct.
It was remarkable that the U.S. attorneys office in Washington led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trumps authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nations spy agencies.
But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trumps bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.
The move to charge the lawmakers among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trumps directives to prosecute his adversaries......
President Trump is using the F.B.I. as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress, the four House members who took part in the video said in a joint statement. No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.
Mr. Kelly is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as serious allegations of misconduct.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
OP
Found one from September that said "at least 11" (and that was for back then apparently starting in August)
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
#18
I'm so old I can remember when we had a First Amendment that protected free speech.
CaptainTruth
Tuesday
#4
Where are Elmo and DOGE to put a stop to the money these people are wasting on frivolous lawsuits.
travelingthrulife
Yesterday
#22
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription)
LetMyPeopleVote
23 hrs ago
#23
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy
LetMyPeopleVote
19 hrs ago
#24
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers
LetMyPeopleVote
17 hrs ago
#25
