Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am getting a spoof warning for the bls link provided. Hugin 16 hrs ago #1
The copy/paste text version doesn't run it into the tag like the Xitter post BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago #4
It's missing the "www"... Hugin 16 hrs ago #5
It's not normally required as a DNS would usually have different variations to refer back to BumRushDaShow 15 hrs ago #14
They are using a wildcard certificate for encryption instead of using a proper server name Tim S 16 hrs ago #7
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02112026.htm Works... Hugin 15 hrs ago #11
I call bullshit n/t gilpo 16 hrs ago #2
Same Rebl2 14 hrs ago #20
I bet it will be revised down, anemic as it is. nt SunSeeker 16 hrs ago #3
I can't trust BLS info with Trump and Vought in control. Are they being diddled? CousinIT 16 hrs ago #6
Exactly. Previous BLS Admin was fired for allowing unfavorable numbers to be published...... groundloop 16 hrs ago #8
BLS data continues to be legit. As 30+ year employee on the CES program I can vouch for that. Wiz Imp 15 hrs ago #15
Good to hear. Thank you. mahina 14 hrs ago #19
It's a sample based estimate. As such it is subject to several types of statistical error. Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #24
Thank you. mahina 12 hrs ago #28
That's really hard to predict. But given Trump's complete lack of understanding Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #30
You cannot guarantee that someone moniss 13 hrs ago #22
Yes I can. The acting Commissioner of BLS (Bill Wiatroski) would immediately Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #23
You missed the point of my post entirely. nt moniss 13 hrs ago #26
🙄 Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #29
The markets will roar upward until UpInArms 16 hrs ago #9
BLS is no longer reliable or truthful Miguelito Loveless 15 hrs ago #10
Completely wrong Wiz Imp 15 hrs ago #13
Bullshit. travelingthrulife 15 hrs ago #12
and like all the other jobs number, it will quietly be revised down in a month or two. nt Javaman 15 hrs ago #16
When Rebl2 14 hrs ago #21
Oh the numbers had been released with the down revised number Javaman 2 hrs ago #37
Seize the ballots and recount, by someone who can, well, count. twodogsbarking 14 hrs ago #17
I Rebl2 14 hrs ago #18
Previous 2 months were revised down by a combined 17,000 progree 13 hrs ago #25
And the jobs numbers for 2025 were revised to LESS THAN HALF of what was originally stated. SunSeeker 10 hrs ago #31
Can we trust numbers provided by Trump and his stooges? I don't think so. Norrrm 13 hrs ago #27
MaddowBlog-New report shows 2025 was even worse for U.S. job market than we thought LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #32
"Reducing trust in government in general is very bad for progressive causes and ultimately great for the populist right. mahatmakanejeeves 8 hrs ago #33
"Person who was fired here - you should still trust BLS data." mahatmakanejeeves 8 hrs ago #34
Reality: 800,000+ layoffs this year -- the worst YTD since 2020, per nonpartisan analysts. LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago #35
I'd buy that for a dollar! Strelnikov_ 6 hrs ago #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. payrolls rose by 130...»Reply #1