Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(166,835 posts)

9. In AP's initial article, the mentioned this -

Reply to Bayard (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 30, 2026, 01:13 PM

Friday

The number of documents subject to review has ballooned to 5.2 million, including duplicates, the department said.

So they are purportedly more than halfway through that.

What is sadly astounding however, is that when they do release stuff and it gets posted on DU after many many calls to "release the Epstein files", the threads get a yawn response.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bayard A Badger

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Department says it's releasing 3 million pages from its Jeffrey Epstein files [View all] BumRushDaShow Friday OP

Covered with suspicious-looking Sharpie markings, no doubt Wicked Blue Friday #1

The Epstein files are now the distraction. RandySF Friday #2

Everything can be used as a distraction from everything else Wicked Blue Friday #4

Completely redacted UpInArms Friday #3

I got some interesting bank transfer memos FakeNoose Friday #5

That's a lot of files. They must have suspected wrongdoing long ago. twodogsbarking Friday #6

Does this statement mean they've done all they're going to? Bayard Friday #7

In AP's initial article, the mentioned this - BumRushDaShow Friday #9

Heads should still roll over the long missed deadline, Bayard Friday #13

If you were sexually assaulted and wanted nobody to know about it, Igel Friday #15

One suspects a bit of self-misdirection. Igel Friday #14

Whatever they release will be like Nixon's Transcripts tonekat Friday #8

And I would guess, adding the names of louis-t Friday #10

Wait a sec. . . isn't the DOJ saying that even the USSC doesn't have jurisdiction to make them in2herbs Friday #11

You're merging two unmergeable things. Igel Friday #16

So they were using ICE brutality to divert attention from Epstein, but now they are using Epstein to divert attention Martin68 Friday #12

Obviously. Igel Friday #17