Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump seeks probe of Epstein ties with Bill Clinton, other Democrats [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(172,613 posts)14. MaddowBlog-Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself
The president wants the public to see the Epstein scandal as a hoax except the parts related to people he doesnt like.
Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself
— Jess (@jessflight12.bsky.social) 2025-11-14T17:53:16Z
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-eyes-federal-epstein-investigation-targets-foes-not-rcna243939
The revelations dovetailed with Republicans on the same committee releasing a tranche of 20,000 documents it received from the Epstein estate in response to a congressional subpoena. An MSNBC report noted that some of the additional email correspondence between Epstein and his associates was unflattering to Trump. A related report in The New York Times summarized, in reference to the documents: Mr. Epstein insulted Mr. Trump and hinted that he had damaging information on him.
In the immediate aftermath of the reports, the usually talkative president had very little to say about the reporting (which includes allegations that have not been substantiated by MSNBC). The Republican published a handful of missives to his social media platform on the matter, but most focused on his appeals to GOP lawmakers to follow his lead on the scandal......
Theres no point in trying to summarize in a single blog post every error of fact and judgment in the presidents 116-word rant the Russia scandal, for example, still isnt a scam but the bottom line comprises three key elements.
The first is that Trump wants federal law enforcement to initiate an investigation into a variety of prominent figures mentioned in the Epstein materials but not himself. Thats a tough position to take seriously.
The second is that the president wants the public to see the underlying controversy as a hoax, except for the parts related to people he doesnt like. How does Trump reconcile the obvious contraction? By ignoring it.
Finally, its worth emphasizing that the president continues to act as if he has decision-making authority at the Justice Department and the FBI. There is no modern precedent for a White House publicly declaring which of the presidents political foes deserve to be targeted with federal investigations, but in 2025 it has become an alarmingly common occurrence.
In late September, Trump used his platform to direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to go after three of his perceived political enemies. In October, he did it again, adding additional names to his enemies list. On Friday morning, he barked related orders.
In the immediate aftermath of the reports, the usually talkative president had very little to say about the reporting (which includes allegations that have not been substantiated by MSNBC). The Republican published a handful of missives to his social media platform on the matter, but most focused on his appeals to GOP lawmakers to follow his lead on the scandal......
Theres no point in trying to summarize in a single blog post every error of fact and judgment in the presidents 116-word rant the Russia scandal, for example, still isnt a scam but the bottom line comprises three key elements.
The first is that Trump wants federal law enforcement to initiate an investigation into a variety of prominent figures mentioned in the Epstein materials but not himself. Thats a tough position to take seriously.
The second is that the president wants the public to see the underlying controversy as a hoax, except for the parts related to people he doesnt like. How does Trump reconcile the obvious contraction? By ignoring it.
Finally, its worth emphasizing that the president continues to act as if he has decision-making authority at the Justice Department and the FBI. There is no modern precedent for a White House publicly declaring which of the presidents political foes deserve to be targeted with federal investigations, but in 2025 it has become an alarmingly common occurrence.
In late September, Trump used his platform to direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to go after three of his perceived political enemies. In October, he did it again, adding additional names to his enemies list. On Friday morning, he barked related orders.
I cut trump's tweet/truth social post from this post. If you want to read trump's tweet/truth social post go to the article. I try not to repost trump's disgusting social media posts when I can.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump seeks probe of Epstein ties with Bill Clinton, other Democrats [View all]
BumRushDaShow
11 hrs ago
OP
Trump is desperate, even very desperate, to hide forever what's in those files.
CaliforniaPeggy
10 hrs ago
#3
Yes, and he was at the island with her for hours, too, according to Epstein's emails
padah513
2 hrs ago
#24
Next Trump will say he doesn't have any links to Epstein because of a bone spur.
cstanleytech
10 hrs ago
#11
MaddowBlog-Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself
LetMyPeopleVote
9 hrs ago
#14
This tells me that more files will be released and that Trump is in them....again. nt
wiggs
9 hrs ago
#15