Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,363 posts)
17. The courts have been dicey when it comes to intervening with "procedures" that happen in Congress
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 08:05 PM
Nov 8

per -

Article I

(snip)

Section 5.

Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

(snip)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei


and -

Article VI

(snip)

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi


But there is no "time frame" for when this should be done in Article VI.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MTG has already signed the petition. generalbetrayus Nov 8 #1
There was a story on here the other day mercuryblues Nov 8 #15
This is meaningless if there are no NEW Republicans willing to sign the petition Justice Brandeis Nov 8 #2
Besides Johnson, there are 212 (soon 213) other Repugs refusing to sign the discharge petition. RockRaven Nov 8 #4
There's actually 215 Republicans including Johnson who have refused to sign the discharge petition Wiz Imp Nov 8 #8
They are more concerned with having to vote if discharged from the committee and brought to the floor? Ilikepurple Nov 8 #9
They only need one more signature to discharge, and that would be Adelita Grijalva's BumRushDaShow Nov 8 #6
Johnson isn't the sole Pedo Protector. They all are. RockRaven Nov 8 #3
Where are the billboards and full page ads? usonian Nov 8 #5
So, any chance to call for new leader? bluestarone Nov 8 #7
all a distraaction. i hope she gets sworn in. AllaN01Bear Nov 8 #10
I thought they already filed a lawsuit?!? angrychair Nov 8 #11
"Why hasn't this been heard yet?" BumRushDaShow Nov 8 #13
I get that part angrychair Nov 8 #16
The courts have been dicey when it comes to intervening with "procedures" that happen in Congress BumRushDaShow Nov 8 #17
Everyone wants to know about all of the crimes committed by the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Nov 8 #12
With Mike Johnson absent from his job, what's Emile Nov 8 #14
Well, according to the legal eagles here on DU, Wednesdays Nov 8 #19
That doesn't make sense, seeing how the speaker is absent and all. Emile Sunday #21
trump's pimp doing his job as trump see's it. republianmushroom Nov 8 #18
Why are so many afraid of the Epstein files? Aussie105 Sunday #20
Pedophile Protection Program Kid Berwyn Sunday #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'It's crazy!' Republicans...»Reply #17